Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

juvet.no

Geilo Turbusser AS

Page Load Speed

6.5 sec in total

First Response

556 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

356 ms

juvet.no screenshot

About Website

Welcome to juvet.no homepage info - get ready to check Juvet best content right away, or after learning these important things about juvet.no

Geilo turbusser er en bedrift som holder til i Hallingdal og ble etablert i 1999. Vi tilbyr tjenester av høy kvalitet til alle formål med topp moderne turbusser og erfarne sjåfører.

Visit juvet.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Juvet.no page load time and found that the first response time was 556 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

juvet.no performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.37

29/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

geiloturbusser.no

556 ms

all.css

419 ms

icomoon.css

307 ms

css

25 ms

jquery.lightbox-0.5.js

437 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Juvet.no, 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) relates to the external source Geiloturbusser.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 85.6 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Juvet.no main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 990.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 18.6 kB
  • After minification 17.8 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 990.8 kB
  • After minification 986.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Juvet images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 49.7 kB

  • Original 62.6 kB
  • After minification 45.8 kB
  • After compression 12.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 49.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 18.2 kB

  • Original 22.2 kB
  • After minification 16.2 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Juvet.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (14%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Juvet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

juvet.no accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

juvet.no best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

juvet.no SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Juvet.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Juvet.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Juvet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: