Tools & Wizards About Us
jwbwn.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

jwbwn.com

Johnson Westra Broecker Whittaker & Newitt, P.C. | Dedicated Chicago Attorneys Serving Throughout Illinois

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

460 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

127 ms

jwbwn.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jwbwn.com now to see the best up-to-date Jwbwn content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jwbwn.com

Visit jwbwn.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jwbwn.com page load time and found that the first response time was 460 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jwbwn.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.jwbwn.com

460 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

66 ms

settings.css

72 ms

theme.global.css

84 ms

font-awesome.min.css

68 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Jwbwn.com, 24% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (460 ms) belongs to the original domain Jwbwn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 108.7 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jwbwn.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 44.2 kB

  • Original 54.5 kB
  • After minification 52.2 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 28.1 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jwbwn images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 25.5 kB

  • Original 203.1 kB
  • After minification 203.1 kB
  • After compression 177.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.5 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 49.0 kB
  • After minification 49.0 kB
  • After compression 38.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jwbwn.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.9 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (74%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jwbwn. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.jwbwn.com

www.jwbwn.com

460 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

66 ms

settings.css

settings.css

72 ms

theme.global.css

theme.global.css

84 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

68 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

28 ms

template_2.css

template_2.css

75 ms

layout_161.css

layout_161.css

87 ms

template_custom_2.css

template_custom_2.css

89 ms

layout_custom_39.css

layout_custom_39.css

90 ms

layout_custom_121.css

layout_custom_121.css

99 ms

layout_custom_67.css

layout_custom_67.css

103 ms

slick.css

slick.css

106 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

111 ms

animate.css

animate.css

112 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

149 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

124 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

168 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

159 ms

holder.js

holder.js

135 ms

modernizr.custom.97074.js

modernizr.custom.97074.js

146 ms

jquery.hoverdir.js

jquery.hoverdir.js

160 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

184 ms

ScrollMagic.min.js

ScrollMagic.min.js

186 ms

jquery.ScrollMagic.min.js

jquery.ScrollMagic.min.js

187 ms

debug.addIndicators.min.js

debug.addIndicators.min.js

187 ms

css

css

34 ms

css

css

51 ms

css

css

56 ms

css

css

57 ms

css

css

56 ms

css

css

56 ms

css

css

56 ms

css

css

68 ms

css

css

73 ms

css

css

70 ms

css

css

70 ms

css

css

35 ms

css

css

37 ms

css

css

23 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

149 ms

hm_top.png

hm_top.png

173 ms

cdxsc.jpg

cdxsc.jpg

202 ms

hom11.jpg

hom11.jpg

139 ms

hm1.jpg

hm1.jpg

84 ms

hm2.jpg

hm2.jpg

85 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

41 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

33 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

38 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

45 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

49 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

53 ms

lawpromo_sm.png

lawpromo_sm.png

137 ms

theme.global.tbs3.min.js

theme.global.tbs3.min.js

50 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

26 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

38 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

35 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

31 ms

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

32 ms

Accessibility Review

jwbwn.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

jwbwn.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

jwbwn.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jwbwn.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jwbwn.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jwbwn.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jwbwn. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: