8.5 sec in total
1.3 sec
5 sec
2.2 sec
Welcome to largo.jugem.cc homepage info - get ready to check Largo Jugem best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about largo.jugem.cc
Visit largo.jugem.ccWe analyzed Largo.jugem.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
largo.jugem.cc performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
78/100
10%
Value2.3 s
94/100
25%
Value2.8 s
95/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.8 s
79/100
10%
1262 ms
311 ms
80 ms
70 ms
1045 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Largo.jugem.cc, 27% (26 requests) were made to Img-cdn.jg.jugem.jp and 10% (10 requests) were made to Imaging.jugem.jp. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) relates to the external source Img-cdn.jg.jugem.jp.
Page size can be reduced by 366.9 kB (20%)
1.9 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Largo.jugem.cc main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 184.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 184.4 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 129.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Largo Jugem images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 50.1 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Largo.jugem.cc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (39%)
85
52
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Largo Jugem. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
largo.jugem.cc
1262 ms
jm_style.css
311 ms
widgets.js
80 ms
analytics.js
70 ms
20150224_1566101.jpg
1045 ms
20150224_1566103.jpg
823 ms
20150224_1566102.jpg
481 ms
20150224_1566107.jpg
714 ms
20150114_1513157.jpg
617 ms
20150114_1513155.jpg
481 ms
20150114_1513158.jpg
1412 ms
20150114_1513159.jpg
1295 ms
20150114_1513156.jpg
1208 ms
20141205_1466147.jpg
1430 ms
20141205_1466145.jpg
1203 ms
20141205_1466144.jpg
1660 ms
20141205_1466146.jpg
2687 ms
20141108_1427925.jpg
1840 ms
20141108_1427924.jpg
1938 ms
20141108_1427923.jpg
2201 ms
20141014_1393862.jpg
2441 ms
20141014_1393861.jpg
2313 ms
20141014_1393860.jpg
2285 ms
20140903_1333170.jpg
2409 ms
largo.jugem.cc
643 ms
center.gif
201 ms
head.gif
354 ms
bottom.gif
343 ms
0f0d475459514103.js
841 ms
044586900
875 ms
20140903_1333169.jpg
2971 ms
20140903_1333171.jpg
2678 ms
20140903_1333178.jpg
3048 ms
20140701_1240915.jpg
3358 ms
20140701_1240916.jpg
3446 ms
newentries.gif
271 ms
categories.gif
320 ms
archives.gif
309 ms
links.gif
436 ms
profile.gif
430 ms
top.gif
448 ms
collect
14 ms
share.js
296 ms
collect
60 ms
center.gif
181 ms
newentries.gif
43 ms
bottom.gif
39 ms
head.gif
28 ms
archives.gif
5 ms
categories.gif
16 ms
share_button.html
324 ms
share_button.html
328 ms
share_button.html
329 ms
share_button.html
330 ms
share_button.html
331 ms
share_button.html
332 ms
share_button.html
586 ms
sdk.js
269 ms
cell.gif
179 ms
collect
10 ms
profile.gif
6 ms
links.gif
110 ms
top.gif
97 ms
cell.gif
120 ms
20040306_591539.jpg
2874 ms
bt_check_6.png
33 ms
30 ms
xd_arbiter.php
215 ms
xd_arbiter.php
424 ms
embed.js
610 ms
powered-by_Normal.gif
188 ms
0.gif
348 ms
Zen
345 ms
encount
527 ms
trac.js
505 ms
assault
527 ms
assault
568 ms
delivery
154 ms
1.13.17
500 ms
fire
195 ms
247
166 ms
fire
194 ms
track
175 ms
track
175 ms
track
372 ms
cookiesync
598 ms
sync
212 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
453 ms
share_button.php
87 ms
share_button.php
49 ms
share_button.php
62 ms
share_button.php
54 ms
share_button.php
72 ms
share_button.php
72 ms
share_button.php
72 ms
wy1X4hBW7e7.js
488 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
616 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.ja.html
69 ms
largo.jugem.cc accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
largo.jugem.cc best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
largo.jugem.cc SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
JA
N/A
EUC-JP
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Largo.jugem.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Largo.jugem.cc main page’s claimed encoding is euc-jp. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
largo.jugem.cc
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Largo Jugem. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: