Access pvl.joomexp.com. WordPress vs. Joomla: which is better?

Report Summary

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pvl Joomexp content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pvl.joomexp.com

And that’s what we’re here to discuss; the pros and cons of WordPress vs. Joomla so you can decide which one is better for your next website.

Visit pvl.joomexp.com

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,160 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.097

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.3 s

31/100

10%

pvl.joomexp.com

57 ms

156 ms

gtm.js

115 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

32 ms

style.min.css

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Pvl.joomexp.com, 75% (44 requests) were made to Easywp.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (728 ms) relates to the external source Easywp.com.

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

989.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Pvl.joomexp.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 875.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 52.3 kB

Original 69.0 kB
After minification 66.9 kB
After compression 16.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 191.2 kB

Original 875.5 kB
After minification 684.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pvl Joomexp needs image optimization as it can save up to 191.2 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

Original 209.1 kB
After minification 209.1 kB
After compression 206.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 92 B

Original 82.0 kB
After minification 82.0 kB
After compression 82.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pvl.joomexp.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pvl Joomexp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pvl.joomexp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pvl.joomexp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pvl.joomexp.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pvl Joomexp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

WordPress vs. Joomla: which is better? - EasyWP

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)