Tools & Wizards About Us
vat.joomexp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

vat.joomexp.com

WordPress vs. Joomla: which is better? - EasyWP

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

245 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

vat.joomexp.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to vat.joomexp.com homepage info - get ready to check Vat Joomexp best content for Turkey right away, or after learning these important things about vat.joomexp.com

And that’s what we’re here to discuss; the pros and cons of WordPress vs. Joomla so you can decide which one is better for your next website.

Visit vat.joomexp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vat.joomexp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 245 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vat.joomexp.com performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

81/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

67/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.097

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vat.joomexp.com

245 ms

201 ms

gtm.js

145 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

30 ms

style.min.css

402 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Vat.joomexp.com, 68% (44 requests) were made to Easywp.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (491 ms) relates to the external source Easywp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 110.5 kB (11%)

Content Size

969.9 kB

After Optimization

859.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vat.joomexp.com main page is 969.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 805.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 51.4 kB

  • Original 68.3 kB
  • After minification 66.2 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 58.6 kB

  • Original 805.0 kB
  • After minification 746.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vat Joomexp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 372 B

  • Original 75.4 kB
  • After minification 75.4 kB
  • After compression 75.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 68 B

  • Original 21.1 kB
  • After minification 21.1 kB
  • After compression 21.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vat.joomexp.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (43%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vat Joomexp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vat.joomexp.com

vat.joomexp.com

245 ms

201 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

145 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

30 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

402 ms

style.css

style.css

37 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

42 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

79 ms

comment_count.js

comment_count.js

76 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

38 ms

index.js

index.js

74 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

62 ms

5670.js

5670.js

117 ms

hotjar-683063.js

hotjar-683063.js

176 ms

quant.js

quant.js

128 ms

collect

collect

38 ms

collect

collect

84 ms

collect

collect

106 ms

collect

collect

52 ms

www.easywp.com.json

www.easywp.com.json

51 ms

rules-p-ybgCwuafUBAFb.js

rules-p-ybgCwuafUBAFb.js

26 ms

a18bb0e21d11a839b7adb013c92ee611.js

a18bb0e21d11a839b7adb013c92ee611.js

29 ms

pixel;r=660880076;labels=title.WordPress%20vs%20%20Joomla%3A%20which%20is%20better%3F%20-%20EasyWP%2Cauthor.Isobel%20Weston;source=gtm;rf=0;a=p-ybgCwuafUBAFb;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.easywp.com%2Fblog%2Fwordpress-vs-joomla%2F;uht=2;fpan=1;fpa=P0-1735653239-1664459887712;pbc=;ns=0;ce=1;qjs=1;qv=d18171e5-20220913105912;cm=;gdpr=0;ref=;d=easywp.com;dst=0;et=1664459887712;tzo=-180;ogl=locale.en_US%2Ctype.article%2Ctitle.WordPress%20vs%252E%20Joomla%3A%20which%20is%20better%3F%20-%20EasyWP%2Cdescription.WordPress%20and%20Joomla%20are%20both%20open-source%252C%20which%20means%20the%20software%20is%20free%252C%20but%2Curl.https%3A%2F%2Fwww%252Eeasywp%252Ecom%2Fblog%2Fwordpress-vs-joomla%2F%2Csite_name.Managed%20WordPress%20Hosting%20-%20Publish%20in%20Minutes%20-%20EasyWP%2Cimage.https%3A%2F%2Fwww%252Eeasywp%252Ecom%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F03%2FEasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-3-what-cms%2Cimage%3Awidth.800%2Cimage%3Aheight.433%2Cimage%3Atype.image%2Fpng;sxl=2107;ses=83817d1c-ee60-40af-8dd4-b2da50ba9354

pixel;r=660880076;labels=title.WordPress%20vs%20%20Joomla%3A%20which%20is%20better%3F%20-%20EasyWP%2Cauthor.Isobel%20Weston;source=gtm;rf=0;a=p-ybgCwuafUBAFb;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.easywp.com%2Fblog%2Fwordpress-vs-joomla%2F;uht=2;fpan=1;fpa=P0-1735653239-1664459887712;pbc=;ns=0;ce=1;qjs=1;qv=d18171e5-20220913105912;cm=;gdpr=0;ref=;d=easywp.com;dst=0;et=1664459887712;tzo=-180;ogl=locale.en_US%2Ctype.article%2Ctitle.WordPress%20vs%252E%20Joomla%3A%20which%20is%20better%3F%20-%20EasyWP%2Cdescription.WordPress%20and%20Joomla%20are%20both%20open-source%252C%20which%20means%20the%20software%20is%20free%252C%20but%2Curl.https%3A%2F%2Fwww%252Eeasywp%252Ecom%2Fblog%2Fwordpress-vs-joomla%2F%2Csite_name.Managed%20WordPress%20Hosting%20-%20Publish%20in%20Minutes%20-%20EasyWP%2Cimage.https%3A%2F%2Fwww%252Eeasywp%252Ecom%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F03%2FEasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-3-what-cms%2Cimage%3Awidth.800%2Cimage%3Aheight.433%2Cimage%3Atype.image%2Fpng;sxl=2107;ses=83817d1c-ee60-40af-8dd4-b2da50ba9354

40 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

104 ms

modules.8203b45d0468dcab4b64.js

modules.8203b45d0468dcab4b64.js

57 ms

logo-easywp-tm.svg

logo-easywp-tm.svg

133 ms

search.svg

search.svg

135 ms

hamburger.svg

hamburger.svg

139 ms

EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-1-cover.png

EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-1-cover.png

136 ms

isobel.png

isobel.png

142 ms

EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-2-cost-to-run-1.png

EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-2-cost-to-run-1.png

436 ms

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-5.png

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-5.png

141 ms

wordpress-vs-joomla-infographics.png

wordpress-vs-joomla-infographics.png

141 ms

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-2.png

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-2.png

135 ms

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-3.png

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-3.png

142 ms

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-4-1024x577.png

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-4-1024x577.png

143 ms

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-7.png

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-7.png

143 ms

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-6-1024x770.png

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-6-1024x770.png

145 ms

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-1-1024x574.png

wordpress-vs-joomla-comparison-1-1024x574.png

144 ms

EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-3-what-cms-do-1.png

EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-3-what-cms-do-1.png

150 ms

EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-4-how-get-help-1.png

EasyWP-wp-vs-joomla-4-how-get-help-1.png

150 ms

twitter.svg

twitter.svg

153 ms

facebook.svg

facebook.svg

149 ms

linkedin.svg

linkedin.svg

146 ms

EasyWP-website-cost-1-cover.png

EasyWP-website-cost-1-cover.png

151 ms

karol.png

karol.png

156 ms

cover-wordpress-vs-weebly@2x.png

cover-wordpress-vs-weebly@2x.png

151 ms

erin.png

erin.png

150 ms

product-detail@3x.svg

product-detail@3x.svg

152 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

130 ms

Intelo-Semibold.woff

Intelo-Semibold.woff

54 ms

Intelo-Bold.woff

Intelo-Bold.woff

53 ms

Intelo-Regular.woff

Intelo-Regular.woff

51 ms

Intelo-Light.woff

Intelo-Light.woff

127 ms

Intelo-Alt-ExtraBold.woff

Intelo-Alt-ExtraBold.woff

491 ms

Intelo-Italic.woff

Intelo-Italic.woff

126 ms

Intelo-LightItalic.woff

Intelo-LightItalic.woff

125 ms

Intelo-SemiboldItalic.woff

Intelo-SemiboldItalic.woff

447 ms

Intelo-BoldItalic.woff

Intelo-BoldItalic.woff

130 ms

count.js

count.js

216 ms

logo-easywp-octopus.svg

logo-easywp-octopus.svg

82 ms

logo-namecheap.svg

logo-namecheap.svg

79 ms

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

79 ms

509700933177832

509700933177832

56 ms

collect

collect

4 ms

Accessibility Review

vat.joomexp.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

vat.joomexp.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

vat.joomexp.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vat.joomexp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vat.joomexp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vat.joomexp.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vat Joomexp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: