617 ms in total
47 ms
492 ms
78 ms
Visit widgets.jobscore.com now to see the best up-to-date Widgets Job Score content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about widgets.jobscore.com
Are you an Employer? Login to your JobScore Employer account to get more out of your recruiting efforts today.
Visit widgets.jobscore.comWe analyzed Widgets.jobscore.com page load time and found that the first response time was 47 ms and then it took 570 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
widgets.jobscore.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value9.4 s
0/100
25%
Value5.7 s
52/100
10%
Value1,920 ms
8/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.5 s
5/100
10%
47 ms
50 ms
22 ms
103 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Widgets.jobscore.com, 32% (9 requests) were made to Static.jobscore.com and 32% (9 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (103 ms) relates to the external source Hire.jobscore.com.
Page size can be reduced by 8.9 kB (1%)
1.0 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Widgets.jobscore.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 656.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 7.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Widgets Job Score images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 999 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 99 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Widgets.jobscore.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (56%)
16
7
The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Widgets Job Score. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
widgets.jobscore.com
47 ms
widgets.jobscore.com
50 ms
login
22 ms
login
103 ms
polyfills.js
34 ms
ats-libs.min.css
39 ms
global.css
48 ms
deo4zsw.css
31 ms
prototype.min.js
56 ms
csrf_token_prototype.js
58 ms
ats_main.min.js
62 ms
atsDesktop.js
76 ms
bootstrap-dropdown.js
60 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
71 ms
p.css
43 ms
logo.svg
38 ms
login-cover.jpg
37 ms
google.svg
25 ms
microsoft.svg
71 ms
sso.svg
70 ms
d
15 ms
d
23 ms
d
30 ms
d
24 ms
d
30 ms
d
54 ms
d
55 ms
d
65 ms
widgets.jobscore.com accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
widgets.jobscore.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
widgets.jobscore.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Widgets.jobscore.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Widgets.jobscore.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
widgets.jobscore.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Widgets Job Score. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: