Tools & Wizards About Us
kaleidoscopeimaging.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

kaleidoscopeimaging.com

Packaging Prototyping, Comps and Mock-Ups | Kaleidoscope

Page Load Speed

8.1 sec in total

First Response

3.1 sec

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

189 ms

kaleidoscopeimaging.com screenshot

About Website

Visit kaleidoscopeimaging.com now to see the best up-to-date Kaleidoscope Imaging content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about kaleidoscopeimaging.com

We are the premiere studio for packaging prototyping, comps and mock-ups in the world. Our expertise produces solutions that go far beyond a product.

Visit kaleidoscopeimaging.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Kaleidoscopeimaging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.1 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

kaleidoscopeimaging.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.3 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.632

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.thinkkaleidoscope.com

3127 ms

style.min.css

80 ms

js

48 ms

gtm.js

29 ms

Kaleidoscope24.png

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Kaleidoscopeimaging.com, 32% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) relates to the external source Thinkkaleidoscope.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 437.0 kB (49%)

Content Size

885.8 kB

After Optimization

448.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Kaleidoscopeimaging.com main page is 885.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 319.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 186.0 kB

  • Original 220.4 kB
  • After minification 215.8 kB
  • After compression 34.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 186.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 26.8 kB

  • Original 319.8 kB
  • After minification 293.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kaleidoscope Imaging images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 89.8 kB

  • Original 155.8 kB
  • After minification 155.1 kB
  • After compression 66.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.8 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 134.4 kB

  • Original 189.8 kB
  • After minification 188.3 kB
  • After compression 55.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kaleidoscopeimaging.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 134.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (75%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kaleidoscope Imaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.thinkkaleidoscope.com

www.thinkkaleidoscope.com

3127 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

80 ms

js

js

48 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

29 ms

Kaleidoscope24.png

Kaleidoscope24.png

55 ms

preloader.gif

preloader.gif

86 ms

SalesInfluencerKit_blog_homepage_tb.jpg

SalesInfluencerKit_blog_homepage_tb.jpg

156 ms

FromPixelsToPrototypes_Homepage.jpg

FromPixelsToPrototypes_Homepage.jpg

122 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff

20 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

26 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc-.woff

31 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

36 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff

43 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

44 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff

45 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

43 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-.woff

37 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

44 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzQ.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzQ.woff

44 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

44 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

154 ms

et-divi-dynamic-tb-229790-229988-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-tb-229790-229988-late.css

32 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

31 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

32 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

61 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

44 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

44 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

104 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

87 ms

common.js

common.js

75 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

97 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

80 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

88 ms

magnific-popup.min.js

magnific-popup.min.js

91 ms

functions.min.js

functions.min.js

133 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

186 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

133 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

133 ms

Accessibility Review

kaleidoscopeimaging.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

kaleidoscopeimaging.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

kaleidoscopeimaging.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kaleidoscopeimaging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kaleidoscopeimaging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

kaleidoscopeimaging.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Kaleidoscope Imaging. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: