16.8 sec in total
2.2 sec
14.3 sec
277 ms
Welcome to kevista.com homepage info - get ready to check KEVISTA best content for Malaysia right away, or after learning these important things about kevista.com
KEVISTA.com ~ Think To Strategize - Web Project Management, Building Web Presence, Web Technology Optimization
Visit kevista.comWe analyzed Kevista.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 14.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
kevista.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value4.2 s
43/100
25%
Value12.7 s
3/100
10%
Value90 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.067
97/100
15%
Value4.9 s
78/100
10%
2173 ms
902 ms
610 ms
628 ms
612 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Kevista.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Shield.sitelock.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Kevista.com.
Page size can be reduced by 699.2 kB (34%)
2.1 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Kevista.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. KEVISTA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 385.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 385.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 237.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kevista.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 237.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (77%)
86
20
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of KEVISTA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
kevista.com
2173 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
902 ms
styles.css
610 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
628 ms
tp_twitter_plugin.css
612 ms
settings.css
909 ms
css
25 ms
dynamic-captions.css
836 ms
pagenavi-css.css
1187 ms
style.css
1182 ms
prettyPhoto.css
1443 ms
owl.carousel.css
1403 ms
owl.theme.css
1441 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
1478 ms
responsive.css
1986 ms
images.css
1765 ms
style.css
1965 ms
style.php
2428 ms
raleway.css
2004 ms
css
32 ms
woocommerce.css
2000 ms
jquery.js
3165 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
2494 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
3318 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
3349 ms
custom.css
2567 ms
jquery.form.min.js
2805 ms
scripts.js
2781 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
3164 ms
light.js
3367 ms
core.min.js
3412 ms
widget.min.js
3473 ms
mouse.min.js
3659 ms
sortable.min.js
3935 ms
tabs.min.js
3709 ms
accordion.min.js
3966 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
3933 ms
jquery.swiper.min.js
4289 ms
jquery.plugins.js
4748 ms
mfn.menu.js
3917 ms
scripts.js
4383 ms
comment-reply.min.js
4114 ms
wp-embed.min.js
3999 ms
base.css
4509 ms
animate.min.css
5070 ms
buttons.css
4517 ms
fonts.css
4541 ms
isotope.css
4373 ms
grid.css
4318 ms
layout.css
5051 ms
shortcodes.css
5103 ms
variables.css
4506 ms
jquery.ui.base.css
4597 ms
jquery.ui.theme.css
4890 ms
fontawesome.css
1342 ms
socialico.css
1084 ms
jquery.ui.core.css
542 ms
jquery.ui.accordion.css
531 ms
jquery.ui.tabs.css
565 ms
kevista.com
178 ms
header_shadow.png
287 ms
pattern_slashes_10.png
529 ms
ico_search.png
564 ms
pattern_form.png
544 ms
pattern_slashes_6.png
583 ms
ico_mail.png
598 ms
KEVISTA-Logo-3002.png
849 ms
pattern_slashes_3.png
1094 ms
menu_shadow.png
1117 ms
Social-Media-Marketing-Strategy.jpg
3382 ms
digital-strategy-950px.png
2375 ms
cloud-strategy.jpg
2392 ms
web-solutions.jpg
1612 ms
website-design-header.jpg
1880 ms
seo-search-engine-optimization.jpg
2594 ms
web-business-success-sales-products-intellectual-services-4xx.jpg
2481 ms
services3.png
2843 ms
kevista-help-support-round-button-question-question-mark-180.png
3348 ms
kaeis-web-support-online-website-for-all.png
3453 ms
arrow_right.png
3031 ms
divider.png
3151 ms
back_to_top.png
3405 ms
back_to_top_arrow.png
3606 ms
raleway-regular-webfont.woff
4005 ms
raleway-light-webfont.woff
4116 ms
raleway-thin-webfont.woff
4232 ms
raleway-bold-webfont.woff
4212 ms
loader.gif
3913 ms
timer.png
4030 ms
large_left.png
4445 ms
large_right.png
4442 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
5062 ms
kevista.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
kevista.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
kevista.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kevista.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kevista.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
kevista.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of KEVISTA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: