Tools & Wizards About Us
kimarkbox.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

kimarkbox.net

Die Cutting, Kimark folding Boxes Manchester, NH Home

Page Load Speed

8.3 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

6.5 sec

Page Rendered

202 ms

kimarkbox.net screenshot

About Website

Visit kimarkbox.net now to see the best up-to-date Kimark Box content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about kimarkbox.net

Manufactureing Folding Cartons Printed Boxes Glueing Boxes packaging design Candy Boxes Medicial Packaging Food Packaging

Visit kimarkbox.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Kimarkbox.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

kimarkbox.net performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.8 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

kimarkbox.net

1639 ms

css

22 ms

user.js

114 ms

jquery.js

1141 ms

simplegallery.js

127 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Kimarkbox.net, 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Stats.netsolads.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) relates to the external source Stats.netsolads.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 143.4 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Kimarkbox.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-95%

Potential reduce by 75.3 kB

  • Original 79.5 kB
  • After minification 78.4 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.3 kB or 95% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 54.5 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 992.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kimark Box images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 10.1 kB

  • Original 37.2 kB
  • After minification 37.2 kB
  • After compression 27.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 10.1 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 8.5 kB
  • After minification 8.4 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kimarkbox.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 42% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (48%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kimark Box. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

kimarkbox.net

kimarkbox.net

1639 ms

css

css

22 ms

user.js

user.js

114 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1141 ms

simplegallery.js

simplegallery.js

127 ms

photo_album.js

photo_album.js

115 ms

PrebuiltBlockStructure.css

PrebuiltBlockStructure.css

101 ms

template.css

template.css

109 ms

layout3.css

layout3.css

288 ms

website.css

website.css

389 ms

4.css

4.css

293 ms

4custom.css

4custom.css

407 ms

icwebsiteelement.css

icwebsiteelement.css

249 ms

PrebuiltBlockStructure.css

PrebuiltBlockStructure.css

777 ms

css

css

19 ms

152_usaflag.jpg

152_usaflag.jpg

96 ms

216_Style_W_carton_Closed.jpg

216_Style_W_carton_Closed.jpg

118 ms

216_Style_W_carton_Open.jpg

216_Style_W_carton_Open.jpg

119 ms

jsconfig

jsconfig

3655 ms

gbu_o.png

gbu_o.png

1182 ms

gbu_ci.png

gbu_ci.png

918 ms

gbu_logoc.png

gbu_logoc.png

65 ms

gbu_ci1.png

gbu_ci1.png

137 ms

KIMARK_BANNER_bgEditor_1411247731466.png

KIMARK_BANNER_bgEditor_1411247731466.png

1473 ms

gbu_hb.png

gbu_hb.png

170 ms

gbu_topnav.png

gbu_topnav.png

177 ms

gbu_f.png

gbu_f.png

201 ms

print.css

print.css

64 ms

Accessibility Review

kimarkbox.net accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

The document uses <meta http-equiv="refresh">

Best Practices

kimarkbox.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

kimarkbox.net SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kimarkbox.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Kimarkbox.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

kimarkbox.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Kimark Box. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: