Tools & Wizards About Us
kimodegardteam.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

kimodegardteam.com

Homepage

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

24 ms

Resources Loaded

946 ms

Page Rendered

717 ms

kimodegardteam.com screenshot

About Website

Visit kimodegardteam.com now to see the best up-to-date Kimodegardteam content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about kimodegardteam.com

Visit kimodegardteam.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Kimodegardteam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 24 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

kimodegardteam.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,100 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.4 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

kimodegardteam.com

24 ms

www.kw.com

91 ms

All.min.c92bc666617af797b8a5ac2c2184cf92.gz.css

132 ms

js

66 ms

osano.js

106 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Kimodegardteam.com, 55% (18 requests) were made to Dims.web.production.kw-prod.brightspot.cloud and 18% (6 requests) were made to Static.kw.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (326 ms) relates to the external source Dims.web.production.kw-prod.brightspot.cloud.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 259.9 kB (7%)

Content Size

3.9 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Kimodegardteam.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 254.2 kB

  • Original 321.1 kB
  • After minification 289.9 kB
  • After compression 66.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 254.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kimodegardteam images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 57 B

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB
  • After compression 2.0 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 881 B

  • Original 145.5 kB
  • After minification 145.5 kB
  • After compression 144.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kimodegardteam.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (22%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kimodegardteam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

kimodegardteam.com

kimodegardteam.com

24 ms

www.kw.com

www.kw.com

91 ms

All.min.c92bc666617af797b8a5ac2c2184cf92.gz.css

All.min.c92bc666617af797b8a5ac2c2184cf92.gz.css

132 ms

js

js

66 ms

osano.js

osano.js

106 ms

redirects.min.a5b63c41499e1e22d36291a7ab1a66a9.gz.js

redirects.min.a5b63c41499e1e22d36291a7ab1a66a9.gz.js

126 ms

webcomponents-loader.ce44f83d1399e8dd41e607b70e0642c9.gz.js

webcomponents-loader.ce44f83d1399e8dd41e607b70e0642c9.gz.js

195 ms

All.min.baf1100ca54d20d2a1f632bcedd539f3.gz.js

All.min.baf1100ca54d20d2a1f632bcedd539f3.gz.js

213 ms

datadog-rum.js

datadog-rum.js

91 ms

IEPolyfills.min.8465a07f5ca79ebc454ca39edbf9d76f.gz.js

IEPolyfills.min.8465a07f5ca79ebc454ca39edbf9d76f.gz.js

66 ms

css

css

133 ms

219 ms

290 ms

290 ms

301 ms

301 ms

302 ms

302 ms

301 ms

326 ms

315 ms

303 ms

325 ms

303 ms

326 ms

325 ms

325 ms

All.min.c92bc666617af797b8a5ac2c2184cf92.gz.css

All.min.c92bc666617af797b8a5ac2c2184cf92.gz.css

167 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

62 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

89 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

90 ms

60 ms

88 ms

Accessibility Review

kimodegardteam.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

kimodegardteam.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the geolocation permission on page load

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

kimodegardteam.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kimodegardteam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kimodegardteam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

kimodegardteam.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Kimodegardteam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: