Tools & Wizards About Us
kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de

Kinderschreibtisch Test 2019 ᑕ❶ᑐ Schülerschreibtisch Test

Page Load Speed

8.1 sec in total

First Response

352 ms

Resources Loaded

7.3 sec

Page Rendered

466 ms

kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Kinderschreibtisch Vergleich content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de

★★★★✩ Kinderschreibtisch Test 2019 ✅Kinder Schreibtisch ✅ Schülerschreibtisch ✅Kinderschreibtisch Vergleich und ausführliche Testberichte ✅ Kinderdrehstuhl

Visit kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 352 ms and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value510 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de

352 ms

www.kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de

660 ms

jquery.js

327 ms

lazyload.min.js

221 ms

fbcfce09e2f7099df8a5cee1a568a0d0.js

859 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de, 17% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 11% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 111.9 kB (16%)

Content Size

682.1 kB

After Optimization

570.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de main page is 682.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 345.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 89.2 kB

  • Original 109.9 kB
  • After minification 109.7 kB
  • After compression 20.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 20.2 kB

  • Original 345.9 kB
  • After minification 325.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kinderschreibtisch Vergleich images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 166.5 kB
  • After minification 166.5 kB
  • After compression 163.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 59.8 kB
  • After minification 59.8 kB
  • After compression 59.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (23%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kinderschreibtisch Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de

kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de

352 ms

www.kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de

www.kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de

660 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

327 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

221 ms

fbcfce09e2f7099df8a5cee1a568a0d0.js

fbcfce09e2f7099df8a5cee1a568a0d0.js

859 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

69 ms

check-yes.png

check-yes.png

112 ms

check-no.png

check-no.png

112 ms

css

css

60 ms

2df79ebff5f05d69a3000c9f326b9ed6.css

2df79ebff5f05d69a3000c9f326b9ed6.css

579 ms

piwik.js

piwik.js

578 ms

Logo_Kinderschreibtisch.png

Logo_Kinderschreibtisch.png

331 ms

kinderschreibtische_im_test_im_kinderzimmer.jpg

kinderschreibtische_im_test_im_kinderzimmer.jpg

654 ms

kettler-college-box-ii-kinderschreibtisch-hoehenverstellbarer-schuelerschreibtisch-made-in-germany-flexible-hoehen-und-neigungsverstellung-perfekter-wegbegleiter-fuer-ih-300x300.jpg

kettler-college-box-ii-kinderschreibtisch-hoehenverstellbarer-schuelerschreibtisch-made-in-germany-flexible-hoehen-und-neigungsverstellung-perfekter-wegbegleiter-fuer-ih-300x300.jpg

755 ms

square.png

square.png

848 ms

kinderschreibtisch-schuelerschreibtisch-schreibtisch-tisch-mario-hoehen-und-neigungsverstellbar-metallgestell-arbeitsplatte-im-buche-dekor-300x300.jpg

kinderschreibtisch-schuelerschreibtisch-schreibtisch-tisch-mario-hoehen-und-neigungsverstellbar-metallgestell-arbeitsplatte-im-buche-dekor-300x300.jpg

849 ms

inter-link-schulerschreibtisch-kinderschreibtisch-arbeitstisch-schreibtisch-mdf-ahorn-nachbildung-300x300.jpg

inter-link-schulerschreibtisch-kinderschreibtisch-arbeitstisch-schreibtisch-mdf-ahorn-nachbildung-300x300.jpg

673 ms

Kinderschreibtisch_Test_2015_1.jpg

Kinderschreibtisch_Test_2015_1.jpg

670 ms

Kinderschreibtisch_Moll_Booster.jpg

Kinderschreibtisch_Moll_Booster.jpg

848 ms

Kinderschreibtisch_Moll_Ovato.jpg

Kinderschreibtisch_Moll_Ovato.jpg

849 ms

Kinderschreibtisch_Kettler_Kids_Comfort.jpg

Kinderschreibtisch_Kettler_Kids_Comfort.jpg

849 ms

rollcontainer-schreibtisch.jpg

rollcontainer-schreibtisch.jpg

948 ms

kinderschreibtisch_weitere.jpg

kinderschreibtisch_weitere.jpg

945 ms

kinderschreibtisch_weitere2.jpg

kinderschreibtisch_weitere2.jpg

946 ms

kinderschreibtisch_weitere3.jpg

kinderschreibtisch_weitere3.jpg

947 ms

XDj_n8VAot0

XDj_n8VAot0

125 ms

7Zp9b6ZgqlE

7Zp9b6ZgqlE

376 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

16 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

19 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

32 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

13 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

33 ms

base.js

base.js

57 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

342 ms

zF_vPuIB9TmKXIhqGvs4Q-1RpaRIMS8epygYjX9fevg.js

zF_vPuIB9TmKXIhqGvs4Q-1RpaRIMS8epygYjX9fevg.js

239 ms

embed.js

embed.js

134 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

49 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

49 ms

piwik.php

piwik.php

3877 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

341 ms

Create

Create

91 ms

Create

Create

93 ms

id

id

81 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

29 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

32 ms

log_event

log_event

23 ms

log_event

log_event

20 ms

Accessibility Review

kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

kinderschreibtisch-vergleich.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Kinderschreibtisch Vergleich. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: