6.2 sec in total
1.7 sec
4.2 sec
256 ms
Welcome to kinderwerkbank-vergleich.de homepage info - get ready to check Kinderwerkbank Vergleich best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about kinderwerkbank-vergleich.de
Eine Kinderwerkbank - perfekt für kleine Handwerker. ✓ Die besten Spielwerkbänke im Vergleich. ✓ Kinderwerkzeug & Montagespielzeug ✓ Tipps & Kaufberatung
Visit kinderwerkbank-vergleich.deWe analyzed Kinderwerkbank-vergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
kinderwerkbank-vergleich.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value3.7 s
57/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.124
83/100
15%
Value4.9 s
77/100
10%
1749 ms
350 ms
308 ms
290 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Kinderwerkbank-vergleich.de, 7% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Kinderwerkbank-vergleich.de.
Page size can be reduced by 490.2 kB (53%)
928.1 kB
437.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Kinderwerkbank-vergleich.de main page is 928.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 443.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kinderwerkbank Vergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 252.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 252.7 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 181.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kinderwerkbank-vergleich.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 181.2 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (69%)
49
15
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kinderwerkbank Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
kinderwerkbank-vergleich.de
1749 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
350 ms
style.css
308 ms
fontfaces.css
290 ms
css
27 ms
style.css
451 ms
jquery-ui-wp-fix.css
245 ms
jquery-ui.css
10 ms
css.php
676 ms
jquery.js
695 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
393 ms
frontend.js
417 ms
easy-table-script.js
471 ms
core.min.js
507 ms
widget.min.js
538 ms
tabs.min.js
563 ms
accordion.min.js
587 ms
mouse.min.js
617 ms
resizable.min.js
751 ms
draggable.min.js
669 ms
button.min.js
708 ms
position.min.js
727 ms
dialog.min.js
780 ms
sortable.min.js
806 ms
kinderwerkbank-vergleich.de
2106 ms
wp-ui.js
852 ms
style-mobile.css
793 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
9 ms
adsbygoogle.js
6 ms
wp-embed.min.js
708 ms
easy-table.css
604 ms
analytics.js
18 ms
ir
262 ms
Schlappilie-Forstschule-Gutschein.png
523 ms
ir
261 ms
Schlappilie-Media-Header-kinderwerkbank-vergleich.de_.png
492 ms
Kinderwerkbank-Vergleich.png
247 ms
Kinderwerkzeug.jpg
258 ms
Kinderwerkbank-Special.png
248 ms
DroidSans-webfont.woff
305 ms
elusive.woff
306 ms
yanonekaffeesatz-regular-webfont.woff
348 ms
ca-pub-3584042782180176.js
163 ms
zrt_lookup.html
156 ms
show_ads_impl.js
157 ms
collect
128 ms
ads
130 ms
41BhCJoHgkL._SL160_.jpg
69 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
222 ms
osd.js
22 ms
ads
127 ms
ads
78 ms
abg.js
29 ms
light-bottom.css
6 ms
kinderwerkbank-vergleich.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
kinderwerkbank-vergleich.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
kinderwerkbank-vergleich.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kinderwerkbank-vergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kinderwerkbank-vergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
kinderwerkbank-vergleich.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Kinderwerkbank Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: