Tools & Wizards About Us
kingwildliferemoval.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

kingwildliferemoval.com

Professional Wildlife Management - King Wildlife Removal

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

75 ms

Resources Loaded

829 ms

Page Rendered

152 ms

kingwildliferemoval.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to kingwildliferemoval.com homepage info - get ready to check King Wildlife Removal best content right away, or after learning these important things about kingwildliferemoval.com

Expert wildlife control and management services to help with any situation you may have. Our wildlife removal specialists are ready to able to help.

Visit kingwildliferemoval.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Kingwildliferemoval.com page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 981 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

kingwildliferemoval.com performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.281

43/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

74/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

kingwildliferemoval.com

75 ms

kingwildliferemoval.com

398 ms

font-awesome.min.css

62 ms

css

48 ms

css

72 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Kingwildliferemoval.com, 21% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (398 ms) belongs to the original domain Kingwildliferemoval.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 157.2 kB (33%)

Content Size

475.1 kB

After Optimization

317.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Kingwildliferemoval.com main page is 475.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 275.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 30.3 kB

  • Original 37.5 kB
  • After minification 25.5 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.1 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 63.4 kB

  • Original 117.9 kB
  • After minification 54.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, King Wildlife Removal needs image optimization as it can save up to 63.4 kB or 54% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 63.3 kB

  • Original 275.4 kB
  • After minification 275.4 kB
  • After compression 212.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.3 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 251 B

  • Original 44.4 kB
  • After minification 44.4 kB
  • After compression 44.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kingwildliferemoval.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (74%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of King Wildlife Removal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

kingwildliferemoval.com

kingwildliferemoval.com

75 ms

kingwildliferemoval.com

kingwildliferemoval.com

398 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

62 ms

css

css

48 ms

css

css

72 ms

reset.css

reset.css

51 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

63 ms

style.css

style.css

59 ms

style.css

style.css

55 ms

logo.png

logo.png

307 ms

wildlife-removal.jpg

wildlife-removal.jpg

347 ms

send_btn.png

send_btn.png

90 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

65 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

52 ms

js

js

91 ms

lib.js

lib.js

84 ms

app.js

app.js

79 ms

lib.js

lib.js

79 ms

theme.js

theme.js

79 ms

dropzone.min.js

dropzone.min.js

98 ms

dropzone.min.css

dropzone.min.css

76 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

23 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

27 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

36 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

96 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff

95 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

11 ms

OpNJno4VhNfK-RgpwWWxli1VXQ.woff

OpNJno4VhNfK-RgpwWWxli1VXQ.woff

226 ms

Accessibility Review

kingwildliferemoval.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

kingwildliferemoval.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

kingwildliferemoval.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kingwildliferemoval.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kingwildliferemoval.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

kingwildliferemoval.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of King Wildlife Removal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: