Tools & Wizards About Us
kitchenin.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

kitchenin.co.uk

Replacement Kitchen Doors Company | Replacement Drawer Fronts

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

204 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

53 ms

kitchenin.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit kitchenin.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Kitchen In content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about kitchenin.co.uk

Tired of your old Kitchen? Why don't you check out our replacement Kitchen Door Designs from £5.59 and discover your desired look! Order online and Get Free Delivery!

Visit kitchenin.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Kitchenin.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 204 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

kitchenin.co.uk performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,530 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.319

36/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

kitchenin.co.uk

204 ms

kitchenin.co.uk

323 ms

analytics.js

52 ms

js

143 ms

uh.js

729 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Kitchenin.co.uk, 12% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Js.stripe.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (729 ms) relates to the external source Uh.nakanohito.jp.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 153.7 kB (18%)

Content Size

848.9 kB

After Optimization

695.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Kitchenin.co.uk main page is 848.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 801.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 7.2 kB
  • After minification 6.6 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 64% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 139.7 kB

  • Original 801.1 kB
  • After minification 801.1 kB
  • After compression 661.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 139.7 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 40.6 kB
  • After minification 40.6 kB
  • After compression 31.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kitchenin.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.4 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (63%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kitchen In. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

kitchenin.co.uk

kitchenin.co.uk

204 ms

kitchenin.co.uk

kitchenin.co.uk

323 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

52 ms

js

js

143 ms

uh.js

uh.js

729 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

171 ms

64 ms

checkout.js

checkout.js

62 ms

pptm.js

pptm.js

166 ms

icon

icon

139 ms

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

48 ms

js

js

209 ms

js

js

220 ms

styles.5f657fa15d400d559184.css

styles.5f657fa15d400d559184.css

169 ms

140 ms

1ye23kyqlvoawp3z7nl28gfazzvcnftl.js

1ye23kyqlvoawp3z7nl28gfazzvcnftl.js

198 ms

runtime-es2015.66c79b9d36e7169e27b0.js

runtime-es2015.66c79b9d36e7169e27b0.js

262 ms

runtime-es5.66c79b9d36e7169e27b0.js

runtime-es5.66c79b9d36e7169e27b0.js

257 ms

polyfills-es5.959cefb915eb1088d6c9.js

polyfills-es5.959cefb915eb1088d6c9.js

399 ms

polyfills-es2015.69714794a946e965552e.js

polyfills-es2015.69714794a946e965552e.js

395 ms

scripts.faa72351f721763f23f4.js

scripts.faa72351f721763f23f4.js

392 ms

main-es2015.f8c0b5e53109e7b4855a.js

main-es2015.f8c0b5e53109e7b4855a.js

475 ms

main-es5.f8c0b5e53109e7b4855a.js

main-es5.f8c0b5e53109e7b4855a.js

634 ms

pptm.js

pptm.js

184 ms

96 ms

ts

ts

117 ms

css

css

50 ms

m-outer-3437aaddcdf6922d623e172c2d6f9278.html

m-outer-3437aaddcdf6922d623e172c2d6f9278.html

16 ms

41 ms

m-outer-15a2b40a058ddff1cffdb63779fe3de1.js

m-outer-15a2b40a058ddff1cffdb63779fe3de1.js

5 ms

inner.html

inner.html

32 ms

font

font

21 ms

logger

logger

102 ms

ts

ts

65 ms

Accessibility Review

kitchenin.co.uk accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

kitchenin.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

kitchenin.co.uk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kitchenin.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kitchenin.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

kitchenin.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Kitchen In. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: