Tools & Wizards About Us
kitemark.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

kitemark.com

Build Confidence and Trust with the BSI Kitemark | BSI

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

41 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

2.4 sec

kitemark.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Kitemark content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about kitemark.com

Establish trust and confidence in your products and services with BSI Kitemark certification.

Visit kitemark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Kitemark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 41 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

kitemark.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,440 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

41 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

16 ms

OtAutoBlock.js

66 ms

otSDKStub.js

86 ms

css2

57 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Kitemark.com, 15% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (560 ms) relates to the external source Digitalfeedback.euro.confirmit.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 259.1 kB (8%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Kitemark.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 187.1 kB

  • Original 216.3 kB
  • After minification 160.4 kB
  • After compression 29.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 55.9 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 187.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kitemark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 58.6 kB

  • Original 118.7 kB
  • After minification 118.7 kB
  • After compression 60.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 58.6 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 40.2 kB
  • After minification 40.2 kB
  • After compression 34.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kitemark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (42%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kitemark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

41 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

16 ms

OtAutoBlock.js

OtAutoBlock.js

66 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

86 ms

css2

css2

57 ms

app.css

app.css

37 ms

loader

loader

560 ms

js

js

74 ms

js

js

178 ms

app2.js

app2.js

32 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

153 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

148 ms

2a08c519-ba2b-4c94-8a8c-eba379c3fa9e.json

2a08c519-ba2b-4c94-8a8c-eba379c3fa9e.json

92 ms

bsi-logo.svg

bsi-logo.svg

76 ms

icon-globe.svg

icon-globe.svg

30 ms

icon-expand-more.svg

icon-expand-more.svg

405 ms

icon-search.svg

icon-search.svg

31 ms

icon-menu.svg

icon-menu.svg

405 ms

mask-hero-3.svg

mask-hero-3.svg

404 ms

gl-grp-brand-transp-hsw-mp-02917730502-1123-img.jpg

gl-grp-brand-transp-hsw-mp-02917730502-1123-img.jpg

409 ms

icon-chevron-right.svg

icon-chevron-right.svg

406 ms

gl-grp-brand-transp-hsw-mp-021087610462-1123-img.jpg

gl-grp-brand-transp-hsw-mp-021087610462-1123-img.jpg

409 ms

tick.png

tick.png

406 ms

gl-grp-brand-food-mt-mp-021366731086-1123-img.jpg

gl-grp-brand-food-mt-mp-021366731086-1123-img.jpg

424 ms

gl-grp-brand-built-mt-mp-021440404376-1123-img.jpg

gl-grp-brand-built-mt-mp-021440404376-1123-img.jpg

410 ms

mark-of-trust-roundel-01.jpg

mark-of-trust-roundel-01.jpg

410 ms

mark-of-trust-kitemark-carbon-monoxide-alarms-black-logo-en-gb-0919-01.jpg

mark-of-trust-kitemark-carbon-monoxide-alarms-black-logo-en-gb-0919-01.jpg

409 ms

mark-of-trust-verified-bim-design-and-construction-logo-en-gb-0422.jpg

mark-of-trust-verified-bim-design-and-construction-logo-en-gb-0422.jpg

423 ms

mark-of-trust-multi-scheme-9001-14001-logo-en-gb-0420-01.jpg

mark-of-trust-multi-scheme-9001-14001-logo-en-gb-0420-01.jpg

423 ms

icon-arrow-back.svg

icon-arrow-back.svg

422 ms

icon-arrow-forward.svg

icon-arrow-forward.svg

421 ms

gl-grp-cross-brand-ms-mt-nsp-mp-0293912701-img.jpg

gl-grp-cross-brand-ms-mt-nsp-mp-0293912701-img.jpg

424 ms

gl-gmkt-brand-ms-dt-mp-02867405200-1123-img.jpg

gl-gmkt-brand-ms-dt-mp-02867405200-1123-img.jpg

436 ms

gl-grp-cross-brand-food-mt-nsp-mp-021498795450-1223-img.jpg

gl-grp-cross-brand-food-mt-nsp-mp-021498795450-1223-img.jpg

441 ms

gl-grp-cross-brand-os-mt-nsp-mp-01santanderdsc09955-1223-img.jpg

gl-grp-cross-brand-os-mt-nsp-mp-01santanderdsc09955-1223-img.jpg

430 ms

gl-gmkt-brand-fdr-mt-mp-02170725178-1123-img.jpg

gl-gmkt-brand-fdr-mt-mp-02170725178-1123-img.jpg

432 ms

gl-md-brand-nss-hsw-sth-01madridevent299-0623-img.jpg

gl-md-brand-nss-hsw-sth-01madridevent299-0623-img.jpg

433 ms

contact-us.png

contact-us.png

434 ms

by-royal-charter.png

by-royal-charter.png

435 ms

linkedin-light.png

linkedin-light.png

436 ms

facebook-light.png

facebook-light.png

437 ms

youtube-light.png

youtube-light.png

439 ms

twitter-light.png

twitter-light.png

437 ms

bsi-logo.jpg

bsi-logo.jpg

438 ms

location

location

407 ms

landing

landing

430 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A99d41P6zUNb.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A99d41P6zUNb.ttf

43 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyDPA99d41P6zUNb.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyDPA99d41P6zUNb.ttf

75 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyCjA99d41P6zUNb.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyCjA99d41P6zUNb.ttf

88 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBN9d41P6zUNb.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBN9d41P6zUNb.ttf

92 ms

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZ9lCjwM0Lhq7qzA.ttf

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZ9lCjwM0Lhq7qzA.ttf

203 ms

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZqFCjwM0Lhq7qzA.ttf

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZqFCjwM0Lhq7qzA.ttf

104 ms

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZmlCjwM0Lhq7qzA.ttf

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZmlCjwM0Lhq7qzA.ttf

291 ms

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZT1ejwM0Lhq7qzA.ttf

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZT1ejwM0Lhq7qzA.ttf

104 ms

Accessibility Review

kitemark.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

kitemark.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

kitemark.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kitemark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kitemark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

kitemark.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Kitemark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: