Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 37

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

kitesola.com

安全加密检测

Page Load Speed

6.5 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

304 ms

kitesola.com screenshot

About Website

Visit kitesola.com now to see the best up-to-date Kitesola content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about kitesola.com

Kiteboarding tečaji že od leta 2009 v naši bljižini: Blatno Jezero Madžarska , Zadar - Nin , v zimskem času Brazilija.Organiziramo kite safarije, uporabljamo in prodajamo vrhunsko kiteboarding opremo...

Visit kitesola.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Kitesola.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

kitesola.com performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

77/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.055

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.kitesola.com

1545 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

97 ms

style.css

89 ms

css

27 ms

ilightbox-style.css

99 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Kitesola.com, 11% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 10% (9 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Kitesola.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (28%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Kitesola.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 63.4 kB

  • Original 80.2 kB
  • After minification 78.2 kB
  • After compression 16.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 61.1 kB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kitesola images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 733.3 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 900.9 kB
  • After compression 296.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 733.3 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 346.9 kB

  • Original 411.1 kB
  • After minification 392.3 kB
  • After compression 64.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kitesola.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 346.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (56%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kitesola. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

kitesola.com accessibility score

37

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

High

Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

kitesola.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

kitesola.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kitesola.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Kitesola.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Kitesola. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: