Tools & Wizards About Us
komplex-m.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

komplex-m.ru

Комплекс-М - Медицинское УЗИ оборудование

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

539 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

341 ms

komplex-m.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to komplex-m.ru homepage info - get ready to check Komplex M best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about komplex-m.ru

Медицинское УЗИ оборудование

Visit komplex-m.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Komplex-m.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 539 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

komplex-m.ru performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value890 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

komplex-m.ru

539 ms

komplex-m.ru

1695 ms

gtm.js

77 ms

style.min.css

141 ms

bootstrap.min.css

278 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Komplex-m.ru, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Komplex-m.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 211.7 kB (28%)

Content Size

750.3 kB

After Optimization

538.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Komplex-m.ru main page is 750.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 303.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 102.2 kB

  • Original 115.0 kB
  • After minification 75.8 kB
  • After compression 12.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 39.2 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.2 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 303.8 kB
  • After minification 295.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Komplex M images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 66.5 kB

  • Original 206.4 kB
  • After minification 206.1 kB
  • After compression 139.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 66.5 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 34.6 kB

  • Original 125.1 kB
  • After minification 124.2 kB
  • After compression 90.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Komplex-m.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.6 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (58%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

28

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Komplex M. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

komplex-m.ru

komplex-m.ru

539 ms

komplex-m.ru

komplex-m.ru

1695 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

77 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

141 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

278 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

404 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

540 ms

menu_default.css

menu_default.css

402 ms

bossblog.css

bossblog.css

406 ms

boss_megamenu.css

boss_megamenu.css

406 ms

jquery.jgrowl.css

jquery.jgrowl.css

409 ms

boss_alphabet.css

boss_alphabet.css

534 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

534 ms

boss_facecomments.css

boss_facecomments.css

542 ms

loading.css

loading.css

542 ms

cs.animate.css

cs.animate.css

542 ms

boss_special.css

boss_special.css

666 ms

boss_filterproduct.css

boss_filterproduct.css

666 ms

revolutionslider_settings.css

revolutionslider_settings.css

673 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

669 ms

custom.css

custom.css

670 ms

css

css

42 ms

css

css

59 ms

css

css

63 ms

css

css

63 ms

jquery-2.1.1.min.js

jquery-2.1.1.min.js

741 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

797 ms

getwidthbrowser.js

getwidthbrowser.js

797 ms

cs.bossthemes.js

cs.bossthemes.js

801 ms

jquery.jgrowl.js

jquery.jgrowl.js

810 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

802 ms

jquery.smoothscroll.js

jquery.smoothscroll.js

811 ms

carouFredSel-6.2.1.js

carouFredSel-6.2.1.js

1056 ms

boss_filterproduct.js

boss_filterproduct.js

923 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

926 ms

jquery.tools.min.js

jquery.tools.min.js

931 ms

jquery.revolution.min.js

jquery.revolution.min.js

1071 ms

jquery.selectbox-0.2.min.js

jquery.selectbox-0.2.min.js

935 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

1070 ms

jquery.dotdotdot.js

jquery.dotdotdot.js

1069 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

1072 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1073 ms

main-page.js

main-page.js

1187 ms

cropped-complex.png

cropped-complex.png

1127 ms

cardiogram.png

cardiogram.png

987 ms

nose.png

nose.png

866 ms

pulse-line.png

pulse-line.png

866 ms

13-150x150.jpg

13-150x150.jpg

863 ms

4-150x150.jpg

4-150x150.jpg

930 ms

1-150x150.jpg

1-150x150.jpg

931 ms

transkranialnay_doplerografiya-150x150.jpg

transkranialnay_doplerografiya-150x150.jpg

807 ms

primeneniye_eeg-1-150x150.jpg

primeneniye_eeg-1-150x150.jpg

810 ms

2-150x150.jpg

2-150x150.jpg

805 ms

uz_diagnosticheskiye_pribori-150x150.jpg

uz_diagnosticheskiye_pribori-150x150.jpg

807 ms

povisheniye_diagnostich_sposobn-150x150.jpg

povisheniye_diagnostich_sposobn-150x150.jpg

926 ms

imitacionniye_modeli-150x150.jpg

imitacionniye_modeli-150x150.jpg

928 ms

uz_doplerografiyq-150x150.jpg

uz_doplerografiyq-150x150.jpg

807 ms

1-3-two-channel-echo-1200-800.jpg

1-3-two-channel-echo-1200-800.jpg

944 ms

1-2-two-channel-echo-1200-800.jpg

1-2-two-channel-echo-1200-800.jpg

941 ms

1-1-two-channel-echo-1200-800.jpg

1-1-two-channel-echo-1200-800.jpg

942 ms

1-1-1two-channel-echo-450-300.webp

1-1-1two-channel-echo-450-300.webp

856 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

19 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

27 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

45 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1005 ms

1-2-two-channel-echo-450-300.webp

1-2-two-channel-echo-450-300.webp

940 ms

1-3-two-channel-echo-450-300.webp

1-3-two-channel-echo-450-300.webp

973 ms

3-3-450-300.webp

3-3-450-300.webp

950 ms

4-3-450-300.webp

4-3-450-300.webp

941 ms

quote.png

quote.png

928 ms

timer.png

timer.png

619 ms

arrow_left1.png

arrow_left1.png

621 ms

arrow_right1.png

arrow_right1.png

633 ms

Accessibility Review

komplex-m.ru accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

komplex-m.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

komplex-m.ru SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Komplex-m.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Komplex-m.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

komplex-m.ru

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Komplex M. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: