2.6 sec in total
539 ms
1.7 sec
291 ms
Click here to check amazing Konkurrenzanalyse content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about konkurrenzanalyse.net
Der Hilfe-Blog für Gründer und Unternehmer zu Konkurrenzanalyse, Wettbewerbsanalyse und Marktbeobachtung. Verständlich, umfassend, praxiserprobt!
Visit konkurrenzanalyse.netWe analyzed Konkurrenzanalyse.net page load time and found that the first response time was 539 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
konkurrenzanalyse.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value4.8 s
31/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value4.9 s
77/100
10%
539 ms
188 ms
5 ms
207 ms
369 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Konkurrenzanalyse.net, 14% (4 requests) were made to Etracker.de and 11% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (551 ms) belongs to the original domain Konkurrenzanalyse.net.
Page size can be reduced by 246.5 kB (39%)
637.4 kB
390.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Konkurrenzanalyse.net main page is 637.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 306.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Konkurrenzanalyse images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 180.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 180.6 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Konkurrenzanalyse.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.1 kB or 54% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (85%)
27
4
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Konkurrenzanalyse. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
konkurrenzanalyse.net
539 ms
css.css
188 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
5 ms
style.css
207 ms
dashicons.min.css
369 ms
desktop_style.css
209 ms
styles.css
209 ms
screen.min.css
209 ms
socialsharing.min.css
276 ms
jquery.js
551 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
276 ms
front_end_script.js
277 ms
socialsharing.min.js
278 ms
comment-reply.min.js
285 ms
jquery.form.min.js
285 ms
scripts.js
285 ms
front.min.js
286 ms
wp-embed.min.js
373 ms
e.js
440 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
258 ms
Konkurrenzanalyse-Wettbewerbsanalyse.jpg
443 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
389 ms
263 ms
t.js
354 ms
dark-bottom.css
15 ms
cnt_js.php
258 ms
cntcc
254 ms
logo.png
5 ms
konkurrenzanalyse.net accessibility score
konkurrenzanalyse.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
konkurrenzanalyse.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Konkurrenzanalyse.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Konkurrenzanalyse.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
konkurrenzanalyse.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Konkurrenzanalyse. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: