5.4 sec in total
269 ms
3.1 sec
2 sec
Visit 2012.lagol.de now to see the best up-to-date 2012 LAGOL content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 2012.lagol.de
Full Service Design für Marken und ihre Verpackungen. Beratung, Entwicklung, Realisierung, Projektmanagement für den konsequenten Marktauftritt.
Visit 2012.lagol.deWe analyzed 2012.lagol.de page load time and found that the first response time was 269 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
2012.lagol.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value3.2 s
71/100
25%
Value3.3 s
90/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value2.8 s
97/100
10%
269 ms
528 ms
7 ms
23 ms
289 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original 2012.lagol.de, 78% (42 requests) were made to Bmr-design.de and 7% (4 requests) were made to Use.typekit.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Bmr-design.de.
Page size can be reduced by 283.5 kB (10%)
2.8 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of 2012.lagol.de main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.3 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 2012 LAGOL images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 82.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 82.5 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 131.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 2012.lagol.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 131.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (24%)
50
38
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 2012 LAGOL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
2012.lagol.de
269 ms
www.bmr-design.de
528 ms
bootstrap.min.css
7 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
23 ms
style.css
289 ms
html5.js
198 ms
jquery.min.js
34 ms
bootstrap.min.js
22 ms
jquery.viewport.min.js
197 ms
flowtype.js
197 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
197 ms
responsive-image-tag.js
279 ms
bmr.main.js
316 ms
vnw0cjh.js
164 ms
www.bmr-design.de
176 ms
bmr-logo.png
98 ms
cross-grey.png
102 ms
analytics.js
180 ms
right-arr-dark.png
141 ms
left-arr.png
107 ms
right-arr.png
108 ms
slide-1a-HD.jpg
294 ms
slide-1b-HD.jpg
296 ms
slide-Raiders-HD.jpg
496 ms
slide-5a-HD.jpg
502 ms
slide-TeekanneT-HD.jpg
776 ms
slide-uhu-HD.jpg
695 ms
slide-5b-HD.jpg
584 ms
slide-5c-HD.jpg
492 ms
slide-5d-HD.jpg
693 ms
slide-5e-HD.jpg
798 ms
slide-5f-HD.jpg
798 ms
slide-Hero1-HD.jpg
783 ms
slide-Hero2-HD.jpg
982 ms
slide-2a-HD.jpg
898 ms
slide-2b-HD.jpg
1062 ms
slide-JackLinks-HD.jpg
1164 ms
slide-Spalt-HD.jpg
1087 ms
slide-Hustelinchen-HD.jpg
1484 ms
slide-4a-HD.jpg
1095 ms
slide-4b-HD.jpg
1276 ms
slide-7-HD.jpg
1546 ms
slide-Diebels-HD.jpg
1290 ms
slide-3-HD.jpg
1389 ms
slide-Kikkoman-HD.jpg
1452 ms
slide-9-HD.jpg
1666 ms
slide-8a-HD.jpg
1589 ms
slide-8b-HD.jpg
1687 ms
slide-Franz-HD.jpg
1837 ms
slide-6-HD.jpg
1773 ms
z12SqCB8rBOzuf7BZ4Y95BNmfA80RM90SGijGKPuRwCff4nygsMdeMJ6Mk6gw6NuSh90iY83ZAlTifoRdhXtgM.woff
56 ms
Z6eyzRzTG1MzgYEYIui7pFMNn1zRSOQXUWWWJghHxOjff4_ygsMdeMJ6Mk6gw6NuSh90iY83ZAlTifoRdhXtg3.woff
124 ms
collect
12 ms
p.gif
124 ms
2012.lagol.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
The document uses <meta http-equiv="refresh">
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
2012.lagol.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
2012.lagol.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 2012.lagol.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 2012.lagol.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
2012.lagol.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 2012 LAGOL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: