Tools & Wizards About Us
biotech.lifesciencesreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

biotech.lifesciencesreview.com

Life Sciences Review: Business and Technology Magazine

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

132 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

85 ms

biotech.lifesciencesreview.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to biotech.lifesciencesreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Biotech Life Sciences Review best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about biotech.lifesciencesreview.com

Life Sciences Review is a print and digital magazine that provides the neutral platform of business and technology news, expert viewpoints, challenges faced by the life sciences industry, and approach...

Visit biotech.lifesciencesreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Biotech.lifesciencesreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 132 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

biotech.lifesciencesreview.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,640 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.261

47/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.6 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

biotech.lifesciencesreview.com

132 ms

biotech.lifesciencesreview.com

689 ms

js

116 ms

css

114 ms

style.css

331 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Biotech.lifesciencesreview.com, 44% (32 requests) were made to Lifesciencesreview.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (689 ms) belongs to the original domain Biotech.lifesciencesreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 704.3 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Biotech.lifesciencesreview.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 62.5 kB

  • Original 81.9 kB
  • After minification 80.4 kB
  • After compression 19.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 367 B

  • Original 46.7 kB
  • After minification 46.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Biotech Life Sciences Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 567.4 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 831.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 567.4 kB or 41% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 74.0 kB

  • Original 256.3 kB
  • After minification 246.0 kB
  • After compression 182.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Biotech.lifesciencesreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.0 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (73%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Biotech Life Sciences Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

biotech.lifesciencesreview.com

biotech.lifesciencesreview.com

132 ms

biotech.lifesciencesreview.com

biotech.lifesciencesreview.com

689 ms

js

js

116 ms

css

css

114 ms

style.css

style.css

331 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

398 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

334 ms

animate.css

animate.css

344 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

336 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

341 ms

slicknav.min.css

slicknav.min.css

391 ms

style1.css

style1.css

396 ms

main.css

main.css

405 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

406 ms

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

410 ms

css

css

186 ms

css

css

207 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

206 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

212 ms

element.js

element.js

200 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

141 ms

menu-2.css

menu-2.css

653 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

140 ms

menu-main2.css

menu-main2.css

637 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

565 ms

menu.js

menu.js

686 ms

css

css

149 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

156 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

164 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

154 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

175 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

571 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

499 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

586 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

586 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

677 ms

main.js

main.js

676 ms

smart-sticky.js

smart-sticky.js

677 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

677 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

678 ms

custom.js

custom.js

679 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

681 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

131 ms

css

css

13 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

81 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

220 ms

Lifescience_final_logo.svg

Lifescience_final_logo.svg

312 ms

load.gif

load.gif

314 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

364 ms

x.png

x.png

364 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

100 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

448 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

124 ms

collect

collect

88 ms

js

js

95 ms

mob-menu.png

mob-menu.png

132 ms

ads

ads

81 ms

container.html

container.html

73 ms

put.html

put.html

115 ms

d3d3LmxpZmVzY2llbmNlc3Jldmlldy5jb20=

d3d3LmxpZmVzY2llbmNlc3Jldmlldy5jb20=

278 ms

16680343009399422064

16680343009399422064

287 ms

icon.png

icon.png

285 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

287 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

287 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

93 ms

test.html

test.html

102 ms

ads

ads

103 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

75 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

75 ms

fontawesome-webfont93e3.woff

fontawesome-webfont93e3.woff

239 ms

dwce_cheq_events

dwce_cheq_events

91 ms

cd-top-arrow.svg

cd-top-arrow.svg

80 ms

Accessibility Review

biotech.lifesciencesreview.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

biotech.lifesciencesreview.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

biotech.lifesciencesreview.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Biotech.lifesciencesreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Biotech.lifesciencesreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

biotech.lifesciencesreview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Biotech Life Sciences Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: