1.7 sec in total
317 ms
1.2 sec
208 ms
Visit blog.line2.com now to see the best up-to-date Blog Line2 content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about blog.line2.com
Line2 is the perfect small business phone system, providing multiple phone lines across devices. View plans and choose your toll-free number.
Visit blog.line2.comWe analyzed Blog.line2.com page load time and found that the first response time was 317 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
blog.line2.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value2,400 ms
5/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
317 ms
232 ms
49 ms
74 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Blog.line2.com, 64% (29 requests) were made to Line2.com and 13% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (327 ms) relates to the external source Line2.com.
Page size can be reduced by 192.5 kB (48%)
404.1 kB
211.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Blog.line2.com main page is 404.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 211.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 173.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 173.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blog Line2 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 19.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19.1 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (87%)
31
4
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blog Line2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
blog.line2.com
317 ms
www.line2.com
232 ms
3b811b257da7a6eb2618d472b4030628.css
49 ms
f10414ebad2971879884873f4dfbe7fc.css
74 ms
e6f6be30a51deae1ed18825be2406196.css
101 ms
css
40 ms
750a3b1459392f1055dad838886eb7e3.css
45 ms
ad64a21127cbae34b46a626ac3220471.js
94 ms
818afc7f8e31c365cf332c712eb23272.js
146 ms
267096d882c63cd3544c4c6ff3f8bf3b.js
94 ms
f775ee5d6c9cef72bde9aea5feb94726.js
147 ms
teads-fellow.js
48 ms
25ac214b7c0d7547f72470e7f896f2dc.js
182 ms
17e0c96e2741c133c9d3826010331d0b.js
180 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
184 ms
hooks.min.js
183 ms
vue.min.js
196 ms
a0e12916ed0a2eaca5174de656e5c45c.js
195 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
212 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
215 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
211 ms
i18n.min.js
212 ms
995dec79d826bbc5f6ccba97c3e2f941.js
327 ms
core.min.js
212 ms
18677f1c5ca6140eb9a2105161c353e3.js
216 ms
snippet.js
37 ms
39506695.js
87 ms
j.php
75 ms
complete-communications-platform-V2A.png
154 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
34 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
56 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
68 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
67 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
67 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
66 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
124 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
89 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
122 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
123 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
134 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
100 ms
trackpush.min.js
49 ms
banner.js
107 ms
39506695.js
105 ms
pageview
104 ms
blog.line2.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
blog.line2.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
blog.line2.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blog.line2.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Blog.line2.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
blog.line2.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Blog Line2. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: