Tools & Wizards About Us
cro.lifesciencesreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

cro.lifesciencesreview.com

Life Sciences Review: Business and Technology Magazine

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

122 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

118 ms

cro.lifesciencesreview.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cro.lifesciencesreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Cro Life Sciences Review best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about cro.lifesciencesreview.com

Life Sciences Review is a print and digital magazine that provides the neutral platform of business and technology news, expert viewpoints, challenges faced by the life sciences industry, and approach...

Visit cro.lifesciencesreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cro.lifesciencesreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 122 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cro.lifesciencesreview.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,360 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.164

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cro.lifesciencesreview.com

122 ms

cro.lifesciencesreview.com

686 ms

js

100 ms

css

56 ms

style.css

325 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Cro.lifesciencesreview.com, 48% (39 requests) were made to Lifesciencesreview.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (852 ms) relates to the external source Lifesciencesreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 683.3 kB (35%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cro.lifesciencesreview.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 70.8 kB

  • Original 92.5 kB
  • After minification 91.0 kB
  • After compression 21.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 407 B

  • Original 229.0 kB
  • After minification 228.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cro Life Sciences Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 538.2 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 832.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 538.2 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 74.0 kB

  • Original 256.3 kB
  • After minification 246.0 kB
  • After compression 182.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cro.lifesciencesreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.0 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (65%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cro Life Sciences Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cro.lifesciencesreview.com

cro.lifesciencesreview.com

122 ms

cro.lifesciencesreview.com

cro.lifesciencesreview.com

686 ms

js

js

100 ms

css

css

56 ms

style.css

style.css

325 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

385 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

312 ms

animate.css

animate.css

316 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

320 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

314 ms

slicknav.min.css

slicknav.min.css

371 ms

style1.css

style1.css

373 ms

main.css

main.css

376 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

382 ms

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

382 ms

css

css

80 ms

css

css

89 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

183 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

182 ms

element.js

element.js

88 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

54 ms

menu-2.css

menu-2.css

625 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

55 ms

menu-main2.css

menu-main2.css

594 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

492 ms

menu.js

menu.js

852 ms

css

css

67 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

123 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

134 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

124 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

143 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

534 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

475 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

474 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

534 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

544 ms

main.js

main.js

577 ms

smart-sticky.js

smart-sticky.js

578 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

626 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

627 ms

custom.js

custom.js

628 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

629 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

62 ms

css

css

12 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

70 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

181 ms

Lifescience_final_logo.svg

Lifescience_final_logo.svg

267 ms

load.gif

load.gif

309 ms

m9itj11.jpg

m9itj11.jpg

485 ms

15sp81.jpg

15sp81.jpg

323 ms

zqapx16.jpg

zqapx16.jpg

485 ms

450x308_fH28.webp

450x308_fH28.webp

331 ms

450x308_LnkX.jpg

450x308_LnkX.jpg

401 ms

450x308_QFfT.jpg

450x308_QFfT.jpg

642 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

642 ms

x.png

x.png

642 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

86 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

270 ms

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

101 ms

collect

collect

60 ms

js

js

96 ms

mob-menu.png

mob-menu.png

429 ms

ads

ads

73 ms

container.html

container.html

73 ms

8414405611155677490

8414405611155677490

287 ms

icon.png

icon.png

283 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

322 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

447 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

44 ms

put.html

put.html

304 ms

d3d3LmxpZmVzY2llbmNlc3Jldmlldy5jb20=

d3d3LmxpZmVzY2llbmNlc3Jldmlldy5jb20=

296 ms

ads

ads

200 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

188 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

187 ms

fontawesome-webfont93e3.woff

fontawesome-webfont93e3.woff

271 ms

cd-top-arrow.svg

cd-top-arrow.svg

141 ms

450x308_fH28.webp

450x308_fH28.webp

102 ms

dwce_cheq_events

dwce_cheq_events

131 ms

dwce_cheq_events

dwce_cheq_events

98 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

88 ms

test.html

test.html

57 ms

Accessibility Review

cro.lifesciencesreview.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

cro.lifesciencesreview.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

cro.lifesciencesreview.com SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cro.lifesciencesreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cro.lifesciencesreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cro.lifesciencesreview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cro Life Sciences Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: