Tools & Wizards About Us
label42.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

label42.com

Post-production - Création audiovisuelle - Web design

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

258 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

926 ms

label42.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Label 42 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about label42.com

Studio de post-production et création audiovisuelle à Marseille / montage image, sound design, enregistrement ADR, mixage, étalonnage, VFX, DCP, PAD, Labo

Visit label42.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Label42.com page load time and found that the first response time was 258 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

label42.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value79.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value40.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value860 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value48.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

label42.com

258 ms

www.label42.com

1578 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

132 ms

style.min.css

221 ms

classic-themes.min.css

233 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Label42.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Label42.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (12%)

Content Size

15.2 MB

After Optimization

13.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Label42.com main page is 15.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 14.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 163.8 kB

  • Original 192.4 kB
  • After minification 190.4 kB
  • After compression 28.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 163.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 1.6 MB

  • Original 14.6 MB
  • After minification 13.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Label 42 needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 35.5 kB

  • Original 227.0 kB
  • After minification 227.0 kB
  • After compression 191.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 22.8 kB

  • Original 222.9 kB
  • After minification 222.9 kB
  • After compression 200.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Label42.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (72%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Label 42. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

label42.com

label42.com

258 ms

www.label42.com

www.label42.com

1578 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

132 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

221 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

233 ms

styles.css

styles.css

235 ms

trp-language-switcher.css

trp-language-switcher.css

250 ms

rgs.css

rgs.css

307 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

387 ms

style.css

style.css

560 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

322 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

411 ms

css

css

37 ms

iconsmind.css

iconsmind.css

418 ms

skin-original.css

skin-original.css

389 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

488 ms

css

css

86 ms

style-front-end.css

style-front-end.css

466 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

479 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

493 ms

js

js

62 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

466 ms

index.js

index.js

506 ms

index.js

index.js

677 ms

priority.js

priority.js

677 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

677 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

678 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

681 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

677 ms

init.js

init.js

913 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

678 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

678 ms

logo_Label42_2019.png

logo_Label42_2019.png

96 ms

fr_FR.png

fr_FR.png

97 ms

en_US.png

en_US.png

97 ms

lelabel-marseille.png

lelabel-marseille.png

1065 ms

www.label42.com

www.label42.com

1129 ms

L42-hall-copie.jpeg

L42-hall-copie.jpeg

1131 ms

IMG_5695.jpeg

IMG_5695.jpeg

1229 ms

IMG_4579-e1559996840276.jpeg

IMG_4579-e1559996840276.jpeg

935 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

256 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

580 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

580 ms

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

661 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

580 ms

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

743 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

580 ms

OpenSansBold-webfont.woff

OpenSansBold-webfont.woff

833 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

580 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

923 ms

iconsmind.ttf

iconsmind.ttf

1065 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

1185 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

87 ms

Accessibility Review

label42.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

label42.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

label42.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Label42.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Label42.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

label42.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Label 42. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: