Tools & Wizards About Us
labourleave.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

labourleave.org

Labourleave | campaign for a reformed EU

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

222 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

235 ms

labourleave.org screenshot

About Website

Visit labourleave.org now to see the best up-to-date Labourleave content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about labourleave.org

Visit labourleave.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Labourleave.org page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

labourleave.org performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

75/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

labourleave.org

222 ms

labourleave.org

478 ms

css

30 ms

styles.css

18 ms

grid.css

71 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Labourleave.org, 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (481 ms) belongs to the original domain Labourleave.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 26.6 kB (72%)

Content Size

37.0 kB

After Optimization

10.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Labourleave.org main page is 37.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 33.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 26.2 kB

  • Original 33.3 kB
  • After minification 30.0 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 471 B

  • Original 3.7 kB
  • After minification 3.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Labourleave needs image optimization as it can save up to 471 B or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (85%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Labourleave. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

labourleave.org

labourleave.org

222 ms

labourleave.org

labourleave.org

478 ms

css

css

30 ms

styles.css

styles.css

18 ms

grid.css

grid.css

71 ms

base.css

base.css

109 ms

layout.css

layout.css

89 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

72 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

85 ms

mediaelementplayer.css

mediaelementplayer.css

86 ms

enfold.css

enfold.css

95 ms

custom.css

custom.css

103 ms

style.css

style.css

103 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

104 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

104 ms

avia-compat.js

avia-compat.js

105 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

439 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

141 ms

avia.js

avia.js

140 ms

shortcodes.js

shortcodes.js

141 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

140 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

141 ms

wp-mediaelement.js

wp-mediaelement.js

142 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

142 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

143 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

201 ms

logo-lightsxxx.png

logo-lightsxxx.png

13 ms

parliaments.jpg

parliaments.jpg

16 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

18 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

29 ms

entypo-fontello.woff

entypo-fontello.woff

481 ms

print.css

print.css

13 ms

Accessibility Review

labourleave.org accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

labourleave.org best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

labourleave.org SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Labourleave.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Labourleave.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

labourleave.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Labourleave. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: