Tools & Wizards About Us
labstaff.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

labstaff.com

Laboratory Staffing | Science Administrative & General Labor

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

528 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

225 ms

labstaff.com screenshot

About Website

Visit labstaff.com now to see the best up-to-date Labstaff content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about labstaff.com

Laboratory Staffing serves industries needing laboratory technicians and seeks to connect qualified employees with employers.

Visit labstaff.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Labstaff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 528 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

labstaff.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.105

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

labstaff.com

528 ms

css

35 ms

form-limited-bootstrap.min.css

61 ms

aurora-modals.min.css

81 ms

font-awesome.min.css

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Labstaff.com, 19% (7 requests) were made to 3989ac5bcbe1edfc864a-0a7f10f87519dba22d2dbc6233a731e5.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (528 ms) belongs to the original domain Labstaff.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 47.7 kB (2%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Labstaff.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 19.3 kB

  • Original 25.4 kB
  • After minification 24.9 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 28.1 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Labstaff images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 136 B

  • Original 171.0 kB
  • After minification 171.0 kB
  • After compression 170.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 94 B

  • Original 58.0 kB
  • After minification 58.0 kB
  • After compression 57.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Labstaff.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (66%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Labstaff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

labstaff.com

labstaff.com

528 ms

css

css

35 ms

form-limited-bootstrap.min.css

form-limited-bootstrap.min.css

61 ms

aurora-modals.min.css

aurora-modals.min.css

81 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

83 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

112 ms

video-js.min.css

video-js.min.css

85 ms

jquery.galleryview-3.0-dev.min.css

jquery.galleryview-3.0-dev.min.css

85 ms

liveedit.global.min.css

liveedit.global.min.css

91 ms

design.css

design.css

139 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

159 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

216 ms

jquery.browser.min.js

jquery.browser.min.js

109 ms

jquery.touch.min.js

jquery.touch.min.js

116 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

173 ms

bootstrap-growl.min.js

bootstrap-growl.min.js

136 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

143 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

173 ms

additional-methods.min.js

additional-methods.min.js

173 ms

video.min.js

video.min.js

196 ms

jquery.timers-1.2.min.js

jquery.timers-1.2.min.js

183 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.min.js

jquery.easing.1.3.min.js

186 ms

jquery.galleryview-3.0-dev.min.js

jquery.galleryview-3.0-dev.min.js

190 ms

liveedit.base.min.js

liveedit.base.min.js

193 ms

css

css

32 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

76 ms

linkedIn.png

linkedIn.png

99 ms

blue-seal-120-61-whitetxt-bbb-96014063.png

blue-seal-120-61-whitetxt-bbb-96014063.png

86 ms

LabStaff_Xenspire_2_(1)_920x158.png

LabStaff_Xenspire_2_(1)_920x158.png

384 ms

job-seeker_copy.png

job-seeker_copy.png

120 ms

employers-001.png

employers-001.png

262 ms

Xenspire_way_(1500_x_500_px).png

Xenspire_way_(1500_x_500_px).png

104 ms

certi_140x65.png

certi_140x65.png

98 ms

footer-v2_215x92.png

footer-v2_215x92.png

100 ms

font

font

40 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

js

js

62 ms

Accessibility Review

labstaff.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

labstaff.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

labstaff.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Labstaff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Labstaff.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

labstaff.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Labstaff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: