5.7 sec in total
433 ms
4.9 sec
368 ms
Welcome to ladybird.hu homepage info - get ready to check Lady Bird best content for Hungary right away, or after learning these important things about ladybird.hu
Tömeges email küldés, SMS, e-mail, DM, telemarketing kampányokat kezelő marketing rendszer és hírlevélküldő. Kérje ingyenes konzultációnkat!
Visit ladybird.huWe analyzed Ladybird.hu page load time and found that the first response time was 433 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
ladybird.hu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value11.6 s
0/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value2,730 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.172
70/100
15%
Value14.8 s
8/100
10%
433 ms
48 ms
38 ms
54 ms
86 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ladybird.hu, 90% (63 requests) were made to Dotroll.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source Dotroll.com.
Page size can be reduced by 54.9 kB (6%)
846.3 kB
791.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Ladybird.hu main page is 846.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 341.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lady Bird images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ladybird.hu has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (81%)
58
11
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lady Bird. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ladybird.hu
433 ms
dotroll.com
48 ms
38 ms
css
54 ms
js
86 ms
autoptimize_single_90ee12662152283aeb5997b81ad24d57.css
468 ms
autoptimize_single_35488416e7fba349440678a8645d9c2d.css
485 ms
autoptimize_single_c3917974b4b49f3282fa2cdbec9933bd.css
475 ms
font-awesome.min.css
501 ms
autoptimize_single_03757f6ceba37f54091ee17125bc9947.css
495 ms
autoptimize_single_b624ba51e8c6aa7cb534cc941eda4ca2.css
206 ms
bootstrap.min.css
320 ms
autoptimize_single_308f0d0c080af7cef3d46c71a97aa6eb.css
770 ms
autoptimize_single_7c22ad30da6b946248b22f2412929c86.css
897 ms
cubeportfolio.min.css
912 ms
animations.min.css
924 ms
autoptimize_single_be4b1a43dc5afe758c512e7965685073.css
928 ms
autoptimize_single_22bc6dcd3b27a19e20a50f30478ec8f5.css
951 ms
autoptimize_single_febf446b0d2ee5e23e3ee8404b17771a.css
891 ms
autoptimize_single_fe4199289826a8c1948d18e90ac132c1.css
1350 ms
autoptimize_single_c2d6c2845cb1147fd99ffa05682cb4b8.css
1032 ms
autoptimize_single_d642809e00a74a9b071c387f7cf3e414.css
1349 ms
autoptimize_single_ca9a0dc5de03f939ba1953cef4cd2552.css
1373 ms
autoptimize_single_1e191be75d42136564176c7b138824ac.css
1070 ms
autoptimize_single_951221099425497612aac221896504f5.css
1393 ms
autoptimize_single_6755719690737c542dca7a7a576a1302.css
1492 ms
autoptimize_single_4940e4ae72b6124a6eab7e97fc8df1f4.css
1581 ms
autoptimize_single_3fd2afa98866679439097f4ab102fe0a.css
1809 ms
autoptimize_single_83f879cd0e2937627bd3d2344d966bbf.css
1792 ms
autoptimize_single_bbef6190a7c15e0539779de33eecc685.css
1520 ms
autoptimize_single_ee528c946f81bb60440d9e57d4bd2858.css
1814 ms
autoptimize_single_0e695948d6f58d88e90ebd72554ad0a5.css
1948 ms
autoptimize_single_84b896f1c3e9736da0ddd87247617106.css
1692 ms
autoptimize_single_6baa110cce0503a3c8b2ba6abef7763c.css
2014 ms
style.min.css
1822 ms
style.css
1931 ms
common.min.css
2273 ms
background.min.css
2234 ms
v4-shims.min.css
1959 ms
all.min.css
2387 ms
api.js
52 ms
dotroll.min.css
2078 ms
cookieconsent.min.css
1876 ms
datatables.min.css
1828 ms
js_composer.min.css
2468 ms
autoptimize_single_094ecbb344f63a3ae1bf64fe29d87c7d.css
1735 ms
jquery.min.js
2094 ms
lazysizes.min.js
1854 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
2176 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1943 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1894 ms
autoptimize_39bb048567f982a4531fe0f4ae2102e1.js
1676 ms
search-bg.jpg
780 ms
bottom_shape.webp
174 ms
title-line-blue.webp
454 ms
parallax_bg_6.webp
174 ms
plusminus2.png
177 ms
top_shape.webp
146 ms
scroll-top-arrow.webp
587 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
50 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
51 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
52 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
665 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
903 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
511 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
918 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1148 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
1205 ms
hu.png
1085 ms
DotRoll-armadillo.svg
1033 ms
ladybird.hu accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ladybird.hu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ladybird.hu SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
HU
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ladybird.hu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Hungarian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Ladybird.hu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ladybird.hu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lady Bird. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: