Access ladybug-tech.com. USB Power Sensors, Meters/Detectors, RF & Microwave

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,010 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.231

54/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.2 s

0/100

10%

www.ladybug-tech.com

149 ms

8h8w4.css

48 ms

8h8w4.css

70 ms

8h8w4.css

71 ms

8h8w4.css

162 ms

Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Ladybug-tech.com, 8% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (662 ms) belongs to the original domain Ladybug-tech.com.

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Ladybug-tech.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 841.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 121.0 kB

Original 146.2 kB
After minification 135.6 kB
After compression 25.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 39.1 kB

Original 293.4 kB
After minification 254.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ladybug Tech needs image optimization as it can save up to 39.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 55.1 kB

Original 841.8 kB
After minification 830.8 kB
After compression 786.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

Original 407.7 kB
After minification 407.7 kB
After compression 403.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ladybug-tech.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ladybug Tech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ladybug-tech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ladybug-tech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ladybug-tech.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ladybug Tech. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

USB Power Sensors, Meters/Detectors, RF & Microwave

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

www.ladybug-tech.com

8h8w4.css

8h8w4.css

8h8w4.css

8h8w4.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

www.ladybug-tech.com

8h8w4.css

8h8w4.css

8h8w4.css

8h8w4.css

css

8h8w4.css

8h8w4.css

css

8h8w4.css

8h8w4.js

8h8w4.js

8h8w4.js

8h8w4.js

js

rbtools.min.js

rs6.min.js

css

8h8w4.css

main.min.js

geotarget-public.js

selectize.min.js

rbtools.min.js

rs6.min.js

wc-cart-pdf.js

data.js

sourcebuster.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

jquery.payment.min.js

sv-wc-payment-gateway-payment-form.js

wc-authorize-net-cim.min.js

legacy.min.js

jquery-mousewheel.min.js

custom-scrollbar.min.js

info-box.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

maxmegamenu.js

public.js

frontend.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

ultimate_bg.min.js

5g0BtnBf3f-65fb0354.js

logo-web-white.png