Tools & Wizards About Us
laidlaw.ae screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    38% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

laidlaw.ae

Architectural Ironmongery and Timber Doorsets | Laidlaw

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

550 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

315 ms

laidlaw.ae screenshot

About Website

Visit laidlaw.ae now to see the best up-to-date Laidlaw content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about laidlaw.ae

Laidlaw Gulf LLC is a market leader in the supply of architectural ironmongery and timber doorsets and is part of a group of companies including Laidlaw Asia Limited, an ironmongery distribution busin...

Visit laidlaw.ae

Key Findings

We analyzed Laidlaw.ae page load time and found that the first response time was 550 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

laidlaw.ae performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.688

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

laidlaw.ae

550 ms

laidlaw-group.co.uk

1157 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

173 ms

style.min.css

278 ms

styles.css

290 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Laidlaw.ae, 87% (81 requests) were made to Laidlaw-group.co.uk and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Laidlaw-group.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 262.3 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

946.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Laidlaw.ae main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 506.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 144.4 kB

  • Original 169.3 kB
  • After minification 166.7 kB
  • After compression 24.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 144.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 33.9 kB

  • Original 506.1 kB
  • After minification 472.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Laidlaw images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 65.3 kB

  • Original 347.5 kB
  • After minification 347.5 kB
  • After compression 282.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 65.3 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 186.1 kB
  • After minification 186.1 kB
  • After compression 167.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Laidlaw.ae has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (80%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Laidlaw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

laidlaw.ae

laidlaw.ae

550 ms

laidlaw-group.co.uk

laidlaw-group.co.uk

1157 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

173 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

278 ms

styles.css

styles.css

290 ms

rgs.css

rgs.css

287 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

290 ms

style.css

style.css

500 ms

magnific.css

magnific.css

295 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

394 ms

css

css

26 ms

nectar-slider.css

nectar-slider.css

385 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

488 ms

um-fonticons-ii.css

um-fonticons-ii.css

389 ms

um-fonticons-fa.css

um-fonticons-fa.css

386 ms

select2.css

select2.css

493 ms

um-crop.css

um-crop.css

494 ms

um-modal.css

um-modal.css

487 ms

um-styles.css

um-styles.css

495 ms

um-members.css

um-members.css

585 ms

um-profile.css

um-profile.css

588 ms

um-account.css

um-account.css

592 ms

um-misc.css

um-misc.css

591 ms

um-fileupload.css

um-fileupload.css

597 ms

default.css

default.css

614 ms

default.date.css

default.date.css

684 ms

default.time.css

default.time.css

686 ms

um-raty.css

um-raty.css

693 ms

simplebar.css

simplebar.css

693 ms

um-tipsy.css

um-tipsy.css

701 ms

um-responsive.css

um-responsive.css

711 ms

um-old-default.css

um-old-default.css

782 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

888 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

797 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

797 ms

um-gdpr.min.js

um-gdpr.min.js

800 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

755 ms

magnific.js

magnific.js

932 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

982 ms

init.js

init.js

1028 ms

nectar-slider.js

nectar-slider.js

771 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

761 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

761 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

756 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

755 ms

um-crop.min.js

um-crop.min.js

665 ms

um-modal.min.js

um-modal.min.js

664 ms

um-jquery-form.min.js

um-jquery-form.min.js

718 ms

um-fileupload.min.js

um-fileupload.min.js

707 ms

picker.js

picker.js

645 ms

picker.date.js

picker.date.js

646 ms

picker.time.js

picker.time.js

652 ms

legacy.js

legacy.js

737 ms

um-raty.min.js

um-raty.min.js

707 ms

um-tipsy.min.js

um-tipsy.min.js

707 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

648 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

654 ms

jquery.masonry.min.js

jquery.masonry.min.js

704 ms

simplebar.min.js

simplebar.min.js

710 ms

um-functions.min.js

um-functions.min.js

701 ms

um-responsive.min.js

um-responsive.min.js

694 ms

um-conditional.min.js

um-conditional.min.js

635 ms

um-scripts.min.js

um-scripts.min.js

660 ms

um-members.min.js

um-members.min.js

702 ms

um-profile.min.js

um-profile.min.js

703 ms

um-account.min.js

um-account.min.js

701 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

689 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

626 ms

2023-LOGO-for-Website.png

2023-LOGO-for-Website.png

745 ms

output-onlinepngtools-7.png

output-onlinepngtools-7.png

745 ms

2023-LOGO-for-Website-1.jpg

2023-LOGO-for-Website-1.jpg

745 ms

2023-LOGO-for-Website-1.png

2023-LOGO-for-Website-1.png

746 ms

Footer.png

Footer.png

747 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff

25 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

689 ms

font

font

56 ms

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

689 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff

59 ms

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

690 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff

57 ms

OpenSansBold-webfont.woff

OpenSansBold-webfont.woff

690 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

746 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

871 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

688 ms

slide_2-1.jpg

slide_2-1.jpg

302 ms

diagonal_line.png

diagonal_line.png

124 ms

grid.png

grid.png

112 ms

slide_3.jpg

slide_3.jpg

383 ms

slide_4.jpg

slide_4.jpg

487 ms

slide_5-1.jpg

slide_5-1.jpg

487 ms

slide_6-1.jpg

slide_6-1.jpg

486 ms

slide_1-1.jpg

slide_1-1.jpg

381 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

207 ms

Accessibility Review

laidlaw.ae accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

laidlaw.ae best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

laidlaw.ae SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Laidlaw.ae can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Laidlaw.ae main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

laidlaw.ae

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Laidlaw. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: