Tools & Wizards About Us
lancergroup.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

lancergroup.com

High Quality Inks, Screen Printing Supplies, Texile Inks — Lancer Group

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

214 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

183 ms

lancergroup.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lancer Group content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lancergroup.com

Lancer Group International is a leading manufacturer of screen printing textile inks, supplies and many other related imprinted textile products. Established in 1973, Lancer Group has become a global ...

Visit lancergroup.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lancergroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 214 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lancergroup.com performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,530 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.749

6/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.6 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lancergroup.com

214 ms

layerslider.css

53 ms

style.min.css

118 ms

init.css

135 ms

styles.css

145 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Lancergroup.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (376 ms) belongs to the original domain Lancergroup.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 79.6 kB (3%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lancergroup.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 34.4 kB

  • Original 44.7 kB
  • After minification 43.2 kB
  • After compression 10.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.4 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 41.2 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lancer Group images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 409.5 kB
  • After minification 409.5 kB
  • After compression 407.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 71.8 kB
  • After minification 71.8 kB
  • After compression 69.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lancergroup.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (70%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lancer Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lancergroup.com

lancergroup.com

214 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

53 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

118 ms

init.css

init.css

135 ms

styles.css

styles.css

145 ms

css2

css2

43 ms

style.css

style.css

141 ms

ubermenu.min.css

ubermenu.min.css

145 ms

cleanwhite.css

cleanwhite.css

143 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

175 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

229 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

253 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

198 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

279 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

194 ms

50e10f532e.js

50e10f532e.js

71 ms

js

js

78 ms

js

js

128 ms

index.js

index.js

223 ms

index.js

index.js

264 ms

main.js

main.js

263 ms

api.js

api.js

95 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

276 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

274 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

376 ms

index.js

index.js

371 ms

ubermenu.min.js

ubermenu.min.js

371 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

375 ms

bg-pattern-1.jpg

bg-pattern-1.jpg

247 ms

logo-lancer-group.png

logo-lancer-group.png

64 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

66 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

73 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

76 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

153 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

69 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

156 ms

bg-img-1.jpg

bg-img-1.jpg

145 ms

bg-img-2.jpg

bg-img-2.jpg

149 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

56 ms

skin.css

skin.css

104 ms

TECH-CORNER-BANNER.jpg

TECH-CORNER-BANNER.jpg

279 ms

bg-body.jpg

bg-body.jpg

279 ms

TECH-CORNER-SQUARE.jpg

TECH-CORNER-SQUARE.jpg

334 ms

anchor

anchor

41 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

3 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

10 ms

A9Ros6vZskafObX9UNcvkGPMSfRN176OOPR3DhkVE0M.js

A9Ros6vZskafObX9UNcvkGPMSfRN176OOPR3DhkVE0M.js

68 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

66 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

52 ms

skin.png

skin.png

71 ms

icon-muted-white.png

icon-muted-white.png

70 ms

icon-unmuted-white.png

icon-unmuted-white.png

69 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

58 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

59 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

60 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

58 ms

Accessibility Review

lancergroup.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

lancergroup.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lancergroup.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lancergroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lancergroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lancergroup.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lancer Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: