Tools & Wizards About Us
landingpage.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

landingpage.com

LANDING PAGE – www.LandingPage.com | e: Contact @ LandingPage.com

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

553 ms

Resources Loaded

943 ms

Page Rendered

623 ms

landingpage.com screenshot

About Website

Visit landingpage.com now to see the best up-to-date LANDING PAGE content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about landingpage.com

Visit landingpage.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Landingpage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 553 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

landingpage.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,310 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.06

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.2 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

landingpage.com

553 ms

style.css

115 ms

gsom.css

120 ms

creditscorebanner.jpg

371 ms

glock2.min.js

213 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Landingpage.com, 14% (3 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (553 ms) belongs to the original domain Landingpage.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 490.2 kB (66%)

Content Size

738.9 kB

After Optimization

248.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Landingpage.com main page is 738.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 277.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 27.4 kB

  • Original 34.7 kB
  • After minification 34.0 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 53.9 kB

  • Original 158.3 kB
  • After minification 104.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, LANDING PAGE needs image optimization as it can save up to 53.9 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 178.5 kB

  • Original 268.8 kB
  • After minification 268.8 kB
  • After compression 90.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 178.5 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 230.5 kB

  • Original 277.1 kB
  • After minification 266.1 kB
  • After compression 46.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Landingpage.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 230.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LANDING PAGE. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

landingpage.com

landingpage.com

553 ms

style.css

style.css

115 ms

gsom.css

gsom.css

120 ms

creditscorebanner.jpg

creditscorebanner.jpg

371 ms

glock2.min.js

glock2.min.js

213 ms

gsom_s.min.js

gsom_s.min.js

96 ms

go.png

go.png

96 ms

header_shadow.png

header_shadow.png

27 ms

pg_bg.png

pg_bg.png

32 ms

lpg.jpg

lpg.jpg

240 ms

nav_bg.png

nav_bg.png

34 ms

sidebar_bg.png

sidebar_bg.png

63 ms

rss.png

rss.png

71 ms

comments.png

comments.png

75 ms

20140620-040204.jpg

20140620-040204.jpg

237 ms

bullet.png

bullet.png

104 ms

footer_shadow.png

footer_shadow.png

133 ms

at_EFa0bO4U

at_EFa0bO4U

107 ms

f1gK-JEXahk

f1gK-JEXahk

77 ms

q-5ADi3oSf0

q-5ADi3oSf0

62 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

40 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

65 ms

Accessibility Review

landingpage.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

landingpage.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

landingpage.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Landingpage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Landingpage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

landingpage.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LANDING PAGE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: