Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

133 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

102 ms

landingpageexample.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Landingpageexample content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about landingpageexample.com

Studio Design Landing Pages Click to view the landing page option below   Custom Landing Pages Click to view our custom landing pages below  

Visit landingpageexample.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Landingpageexample.com page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

landingpageexample.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

landingpageexample.com

133 ms

www.landingpageexample.com

1126 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

79 ms

bootstrap.min.css

40 ms

font-awesome.min.css

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Landingpageexample.com, 13% (3 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 13% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Landingpageexample.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 150.3 kB (72%)

Content Size

209.0 kB

After Optimization

58.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Landingpageexample.com main page is 209.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 140.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 10.8 kB
  • After minification 10.8 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 26.1 kB

  • Original 57.3 kB
  • After minification 57.3 kB
  • After compression 31.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 26.1 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 116.3 kB

  • Original 140.9 kB
  • After minification 140.8 kB
  • After compression 24.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Landingpageexample.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 116.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (36%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Landingpageexample. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

landingpageexample.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Landingpageexample.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Landingpageexample.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Landingpageexample. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: