4.2 sec in total
1.2 sec
2 sec
1 sec
Welcome to landingpagemakeover.com homepage info - get ready to check Landingpagemakeover best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about landingpagemakeover.com
Want higher revenue from your traffic? Don’t pour more ad spend into a leaky funnel. Let our optimization team find & fix the weakest spots in your website.
Visit landingpagemakeover.comWe analyzed Landingpagemakeover.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
landingpagemakeover.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value4.8 s
32/100
25%
Value5.6 s
54/100
10%
Value1,030 ms
26/100
30%
Value0.023
100/100
15%
Value13.8 s
11/100
10%
1188 ms
15 ms
12 ms
62 ms
105 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Landingpagemakeover.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Static.olark.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Landingpagemakeover.com.
Page size can be reduced by 340.6 kB (40%)
859.5 kB
518.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Landingpagemakeover.com main page is 859.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 415.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Landingpagemakeover images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 274.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 274.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Landingpagemakeover.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (54%)
56
26
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Landingpagemakeover. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
landingpagemakeover.com
1188 ms
j.php
15 ms
ga.js
12 ms
q-a-plus.css
62 ms
wpv-pagination.css
105 ms
columns.min.css
103 ms
25px.min.css
110 ms
gallery.min.css
119 ms
style.min.css
104 ms
stylesheet.css
111 ms
wpv-views-sorting.css
141 ms
colorbox.css
137 ms
jquery.js
198 ms
wpv-pagination-embedded.js
153 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
140 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker.min.js
147 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker-et.js
167 ms
wpv-date-front-end-control.js
169 ms
script.js
177 ms
gf.placeholders.js
183 ms
q-a-plus.js
182 ms
sessioncam.js
51 ms
jquery.colorbox.1.3.32.js
202 ms
gravityforms.js
205 ms
conditional_logic.js
203 ms
v.gif
41 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
style.css
127 ms
home-background.png
151 ms
list-style.png
50 ms
CTA-button.png
50 ms
jason-ferruggia.jpg
52 ms
testimonial-2.png
113 ms
promise-background.png
277 ms
science-background.png
148 ms
renegadediet.jpg
115 ms
linkedinfluence.jpg
114 ms
timelineblueprint.jpg
145 ms
shipwire.jpg
145 ms
incorporate.jpg
146 ms
power-of-pinning1.jpg
159 ms
va-loan-rates.jpg
159 ms
k9cuisine.jpg
160 ms
why-background.png
379 ms
process-background.png
168 ms
urgency-background.png
223 ms
urgency-clock.png
249 ms
peep.png
186 ms
chunkfive-webfont.woff
150 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
205 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
240 ms
loader0.js
83 ms
sessioncam.recorder.js
49 ms
red-arrow-down.png
149 ms
next-button.png
170 ms
config.aspx
186 ms
5353-266-10-6224.js
150 ms
c
120 ms
application2.js
104 ms
inspectlet.js
9 ms
landingpagemakeover.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
landingpagemakeover.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
landingpagemakeover.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
ET
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Landingpagemakeover.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Estonian language. Our system also found out that Landingpagemakeover.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
landingpagemakeover.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Landingpagemakeover. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: