2.7 sec in total
181 ms
1.6 sec
958 ms
Click here to check amazing Landing Spy content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about landingspy.com
LandingSpy - The best free landing page spy tool. It helps you find the best landing page for inspiration. You can also monitor competitors' landing page image,copy and data.
Visit landingspy.comWe analyzed Landingspy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 181 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
landingspy.com performance score
181 ms
394 ms
312 ms
305 ms
344 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Landingspy.com, 69% (46 requests) were made to Zbase-global.zingfront.com and 13% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (569 ms) relates to the external source Zbase-global.zingfront.com.
Page size can be reduced by 583.5 kB (20%)
2.9 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Landingspy.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 327.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Landing Spy needs image optimization as it can save up to 327.4 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 175.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 175.7 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Landingspy.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (74%)
54
14
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Landing Spy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
landingspy.com
181 ms
landingspy.com
394 ms
jquery_1.12.4-wp_49edccea2e7ba985cadc9ba0531cbed1.js
312 ms
jquery-migrate.min_1.4.1_7121994eec5320fbe6586463bf9651c2.js
305 ms
style.min_5.2.7_375bd65d60ff3c8723fccc343afb1b9b.css
344 ms
theme.min_5.2.7_182ddba2abac4cdd9ffda9ac1e64e4b9.css
342 ms
css
94 ms
font-awesome.min_1.1.2_269550530cc127b6aa5a35925a7de6ce.css
307 ms
themify-icons_1.1.2_d31e39df850f71e1b2cd3c2c1826fe30.css
306 ms
style_1.1.2_a6431aff83b44ab55177544ec4113613.css
308 ms
aos_1.1.2_847da8fca8060ca1a70f976aab1210b9.css
309 ms
jarallax_1.1.2_b80225d900588f8298b80d0a248eb1ea.css
309 ms
slick_1.1.2_f38b2db10e01b1572732a3191d538707.css
337 ms
page.min_1.1.2_eae3dc32609c205f8f50f9d29bf52094.css
372 ms
page.min.v1.css
346 ms
jquery.min.js
338 ms
nc.js
58 ms
jquery.min.js
340 ms
ga-assets.js
369 ms
js
117 ms
adsbygoogle.js
120 ms
SmoothScroll_1.1.2_ddb27611bf54a74e40dc23a8913c5ed2.js
369 ms
objectFitPolyfill.min_1.1.2_7ea81a2cdee885d268b48d7c600d10df.js
569 ms
aos_1.1.2_d3718e34eeb0355be8e3179a2e2bccb7.js
369 ms
jquery.countdown.min_1.1.2_5d3ff3c3fbaa67cc639501f44eeb07be.js
414 ms
jquery.waypoints.min_1.1.2_7d05f92297dede9ecfe3706efb95677a.js
406 ms
countUp.min_1.1.2_2ff27ddb6a758e8defbe8750c975e87f.js
404 ms
granim.min_1.1.2_77bb73352c8c9c138d33326092be39f4.js
405 ms
slick.min_1.1.2_d5a61c749e44e47159af8a6579dda121.js
405 ms
typed.min_1.1.2_5d53ae31eda336c919b79ad3590e8589.js
411 ms
imagesloaded.min_3.2.0_7e97ab52c3df75e9053002bb59f2cdd5.js
406 ms
shuffle.min_1.1.2_fb91e20df994252467172e7bc95758db.js
414 ms
jarallax.min_1.1.2_4d95aee2e4fb638240195c2e00125a9e.js
406 ms
jarallax-video.min_1.1.2_07964f804f6de718cd802a418491e57e.js
407 ms
wp-embed.min_5.2.7_2dce40d16f9ff6332d3cbb7ae488a2b9.js
408 ms
client
72 ms
zbase-fingerprint.js
406 ms
page.20210122.min.v1.js
413 ms
script.min.js
410 ms
getrefcodeuser.js
411 ms
fonts.googleapis.css
72 ms
5315a3f6bdc1c73bb581c7e3d9dd62bb.png
83 ms
501fbf682777909a4ed61bb04382044f.ico
83 ms
c001ab61d3f2e626c660566dc63a350__ac99aa1c3f6850b170fc032ab7b59c19.png
90 ms
bcc1dedb5168a0c319a7e8653f503de__ac00644cb21229ccfaf6a8ad8cb33c82.png
90 ms
1-6__2db659082b65e6cb8077373c4164e8dc.png
86 ms
2-5__59f1a7219ac8caed90c7ceb66b0ff8cf.png
83 ms
3-2__7c81565842ce2555834cb52e1e75de11.png
84 ms
7d025131a196136df2f5ec10ea181f2_%E7%9C%8B%E5%9B%BE%E7%8E%8B2__1111fa38db922ed84473cb6ac7956446.png
85 ms
fcb8c06079bd285bbc5dadd5391a384_%E7%9C%8B%E5%9B%BE%E7%8E%8B-1__3ab757a35deebe362e1fc54d98aea975.png
87 ms
8e12a3dd8c99e594c210b0bd77a561fa.png
85 ms
show_ads_impl.js
393 ms
zrt_lookup_nohtml.html
120 ms
js
115 ms
analytics.js
109 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJBbMl2xMB.ttf
191 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml2xMB.ttf
191 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl2xMB.ttf
234 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ml2xMB.ttf
268 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ6bQl2xMB.ttf
273 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
269 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
271 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
270 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
268 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
105 ms
fontawesome-webfont_4.7.0_fee66e712a8a08eef5805a46892932ad.woff
104 ms
collect
109 ms
landingspy.com SEO score
EN
ZH
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Landingspy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Chinese language. Our system also found out that Landingspy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
landingspy.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Landing Spy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: