Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 49

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 70

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    29% of websites

landmark.com.eg

Home - Real Estate in Egypt, Maadi Real Estate, RENT, BUY and SELL, Property Management, Real Estate Appraisal

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

641 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

467 ms

landmark.com.eg screenshot

About Website

Welcome to landmark.com.eg homepage info - get ready to check Landmark best content for Egypt right away, or after learning these important things about landmark.com.eg

Home - Real Estate in Egypt, Maadi Real Estate, RENT, BUY and SELL, Property Management, Real Estate Appraisal

Visit landmark.com.eg

Key Findings

We analyzed Landmark.com.eg page load time and found that the first response time was 641 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

landmark.com.eg performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.06

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

landmark.com.eg

641 ms

style.css

184 ms

bootstrap.min.css

451 ms

font-awesome.min.css

275 ms

jquery-1.11.1.js

738 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Landmark.com.eg, 4% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (882 ms) belongs to the original domain Landmark.com.eg.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 65.2 kB (69%)

Content Size

93.9 kB

After Optimization

28.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Landmark.com.eg main page is 93.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 71.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 62.9 kB

  • Original 71.0 kB
  • After minification 61.7 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.3 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.9 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 14.6 kB
  • After minification 14.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Landmark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 984 B

  • Original 3.8 kB
  • After minification 3.8 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 984 B or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 4.5 kB
  • After minification 4.3 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Landmark.com.eg needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (33%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

48

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Landmark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

landmark.com.eg accessibility score

49

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

landmark.com.eg best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

landmark.com.eg SEO score

70

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Landmark.com.eg can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Landmark.com.eg main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Landmark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: