Tools & Wizards About Us
landmarkroofing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

landmarkroofing.com

Roofing Contractor Newton, Wellesley, Weston, Brookline, Sudbury

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

117 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

116 ms

landmarkroofing.com screenshot

About Website

Visit landmarkroofing.com now to see the best up-to-date Landmark Roofing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about landmarkroofing.com

Landmark Roofing is a roofing contractor serving Newton, Wellesley, Weston, Brookline, Sudbury and elsewhere.

Visit landmarkroofing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Landmarkroofing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 117 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

landmarkroofing.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

29/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,310 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

landmarkroofing.com

117 ms

gradualfader.js

25 ms

autoptimize_single_6cd303cf66c31700e42c56169c86f8f3.css

49 ms

style.min.css

93 ms

classic-themes.min.css

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Landmarkroofing.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (866 ms) belongs to the original domain Landmarkroofing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 58.5 kB (10%)

Content Size

558.2 kB

After Optimization

499.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Landmarkroofing.com main page is 558.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 380.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 28.5 kB

  • Original 37.2 kB
  • After minification 37.0 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 625 B

  • Original 90.3 kB
  • After minification 89.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Landmark Roofing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 380.7 kB
  • After minification 380.0 kB
  • After compression 375.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 24.1 kB

  • Original 50.0 kB
  • After minification 49.9 kB
  • After compression 25.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Landmarkroofing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.1 kB or 48% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (66%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Landmark Roofing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

landmarkroofing.com

landmarkroofing.com

117 ms

gradualfader.js

gradualfader.js

25 ms

autoptimize_single_6cd303cf66c31700e42c56169c86f8f3.css

autoptimize_single_6cd303cf66c31700e42c56169c86f8f3.css

49 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

93 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

80 ms

css

css

34 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

77 ms

autoptimize_single_2dbe757407965057f9c49456732a1d5a.css

autoptimize_single_2dbe757407965057f9c49456732a1d5a.css

96 ms

autoptimize_single_0e4a098f3f6e3faede64db8b9da80ba2.css

autoptimize_single_0e4a098f3f6e3faede64db8b9da80ba2.css

78 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

24 ms

big-tuna-review-plus-toolkit.js

big-tuna-review-plus-toolkit.js

78 ms

index.js

index.js

115 ms

index.js

index.js

115 ms

api.js

api.js

41 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

116 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

116 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

119 ms

index.js

index.js

123 ms

ga.js

ga.js

30 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

81 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

28 ms

loader.js

loader.js

57 ms

header_background.png

header_background.png

50 ms

logo.png

logo.png

50 ms

view.button.png

view.button.png

50 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

50 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

50 ms

plus.png

plus.png

49 ms

back_ground.jpg

back_ground.jpg

105 ms

nav_line.jpg

nav_line.jpg

106 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

106 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

107 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

107 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

106 ms

nav.png

nav.png

107 ms

input_name.gif

input_name.gif

107 ms

input_email.gif

input_email.gif

107 ms

input_phone.gif

input_phone.gif

117 ms

1925654773.png

1925654773.png

744 ms

captcha_arrow.gif

captcha_arrow.gif

118 ms

llocation_title_bg.png

llocation_title_bg.png

866 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

57 ms

aldusltstd-roman-webfont.woff

aldusltstd-roman-webfont.woff

714 ms

undefined

undefined

780 ms

embed

embed

165 ms

js

js

26 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

3 ms

search.js

search.js

7 ms

main.js

main.js

12 ms

aldusltstd-roman-webfont.ttf

aldusltstd-roman-webfont.ttf

557 ms

aldusltstd-roman-webfont.svg

aldusltstd-roman-webfont.svg

780 ms

Accessibility Review

landmarkroofing.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

landmarkroofing.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

landmarkroofing.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Landmarkroofing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Landmarkroofing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

landmarkroofing.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Landmark Roofing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: