3.9 sec in total
169 ms
3.1 sec
686 ms
Click here to check amazing Landscape content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about landscape.directory
Hire the Best Landscaping Companies from Arizona on LD. Check Reviews on the TOP Landscaping Contractors from Arizona .
Visit landscape.directoryWe analyzed Landscape.directory page load time and found that the first response time was 169 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
landscape.directory performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value3,860 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.151
75/100
15%
Value19.2 s
2/100
10%
169 ms
145 ms
131 ms
129 ms
127 ms
Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Landscape.directory, 9% (10 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 8% (9 requests) were made to Cdn.landscape.directory. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Landscape.directory.
Page size can be reduced by 176.1 kB (12%)
1.5 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Landscape.directory main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 622.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 140.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 140.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Landscape images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Landscape.directory has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 81 (77%)
105
24
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Landscape. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 39 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
landscape.directory
169 ms
unslider.css
145 ms
slider.css
131 ms
styles.css
129 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
127 ms
woocommerce.css
138 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
48 ms
frontend.min.css
59 ms
swiper.min.css
71 ms
post-3775.css
191 ms
all.min.css
263 ms
v4-shims.min.css
239 ms
global.css
237 ms
post-27.css
242 ms
google-maps.css
282 ms
icons.css
209 ms
icon
68 ms
select2.css
219 ms
vendor.css
231 ms
frontend.css
360 ms
min-width-993.css
246 ms
min-width-1201.css
337 ms
wc-general-style.css
348 ms
style.css
354 ms
default-fonts.css
375 ms
style.css
400 ms
mylisting-dynamic-styles.css
442 ms
jquery.min.js
491 ms
unslider.min.js
458 ms
jquery.event.move.js
473 ms
jquery.event.swipe.js
409 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
408 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
417 ms
js.cookie.min.js
512 ms
woocommerce.min.js
424 ms
advanced.min.js
546 ms
v4-shims.min.js
565 ms
adsbygoogle.js
136 ms
js
89 ms
js
74 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
70 ms
header.css
541 ms
quick-search-form.css
441 ms
paper-spinner.css
686 ms
basic-search-form.css
686 ms
footer.css
636 ms
quick-view-modal.css
637 ms
index.js
626 ms
index.js
638 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
613 ms
order-attribution.min.js
567 ms
google-maps.js
540 ms
moment.min.js
537 ms
select2.js
523 ms
vue.min.js
521 ms
core.min.js
521 ms
mouse.min.js
516 ms
slider.min.js
513 ms
vendor.js
513 ms
frontend.js
497 ms
background-carousel.js
421 ms
an-main.js
408 ms
quick-search-form.js
418 ms
elementor-column.js
408 ms
basic-search-form.js
397 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
403 ms
back-to-top.js
363 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
394 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
355 ms
waypoints.min.js
383 ms
frontend.min.js
327 ms
lazyload.min.js
354 ms
show_ads_impl.js
302 ms
zrt_lookup.html
87 ms
hero-bg.jpg
62 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
341 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
181 ms
flUhRq6tzZclQEJ-Vdg-IuiaDsNZ.ttf
177 ms
js
167 ms
analytics.js
162 ms
elnp-logo-white-new.svg
257 ms
landscaping-2.svg
372 ms
lawn.svg
356 ms
patio-2.svg
417 ms
tree.svg
411 ms
yard.svg
414 ms
1.jpg
527 ms
3.jpg
466 ms
4.jpg
473 ms
main.js
159 ms
landscape.directory
1198 ms
collect
77 ms
ads
476 ms
ca-pub-1083474729258288
470 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
110 ms
ads
405 ms
ads
415 ms
ads
362 ms
ads
412 ms
ads
315 ms
ads
349 ms
ads
553 ms
ads
645 ms
max-width-1200.css
12 ms
max-width-992.css
13 ms
max-width-768.css
10 ms
max-width-600.css
46 ms
max-width-480.css
125 ms
max-width-320.css
9 ms
landscape.directory accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
landscape.directory best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
landscape.directory SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Landscape.directory can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Landscape.directory main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
landscape.directory
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Landscape. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: