Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

lanetopen.com

lanetopen.com - lanetopen Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

21.6 sec in total

First Response

606 ms

Resources Loaded

20.8 sec

Page Rendered

200 ms

lanetopen.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lanetopen.com homepage info - get ready to check Lanetopen best content for Democratic Republic of Congo right away, or after learning these important things about lanetopen.com

lanetopen.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, lanetopen.com has it all. We hope you find...

Visit lanetopen.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lanetopen.com page load time and found that the first response time was 606 ms and then it took 21 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

lanetopen.com performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.064

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.0 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lanetopen.com

606 ms

main.css

197 ms

style.css

349 ms

fonctions.js

373 ms

nav_menu.js

240 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Lanetopen.com, 5% (1 request) were made to Cdn0.beta.static.techradar.futurecdn.net and 5% (1 request) were made to Dn-cdn-shop-jide-com.qbox.me. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.6 sec) relates to the external source Dn-cdn-shop-jide-com.qbox.me.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 113.2 kB (23%)

Content Size

492.3 kB

After Optimization

379.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Lanetopen.com main page is 492.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 440.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 9.5 kB
  • After minification 8.0 kB
  • After compression 2.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.5 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 72.4 kB

  • Original 440.3 kB
  • After minification 367.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lanetopen needs image optimization as it can save up to 72.4 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 21.6 kB

  • Original 26.3 kB
  • After minification 17.5 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 16.1 kB
  • After minification 10.4 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lanetopen.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (24%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lanetopen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lanetopen.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lanetopen.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

lanetopen.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lanetopen.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed French language. Our system also found out that Lanetopen.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lanetopen. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: