4.9 sec in total
1.1 sec
3.3 sec
506 ms
Visit lanolin.com now to see the best up-to-date Lanolin content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lanolin.com
As a long-standing lanolin supplier, we combine experience and knowledge to provide you with high-quality lanolin products across the globe.
Visit lanolin.comWe analyzed Lanolin.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
lanolin.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.3 s
1/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value880 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value18.2 s
3/100
10%
1135 ms
188 ms
314 ms
402 ms
714 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Lanolin.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Consent.cookiebot.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Lanolin.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (72%)
1.9 MB
518.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Lanolin.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 924.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 97.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lanolin images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 435.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 435.3 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 808.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lanolin.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 808.3 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (83%)
47
8
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lanolin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lanolin.com
1135 ms
style.min.css
188 ms
theme.min.css
314 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
402 ms
frontend.min.css
714 ms
swiper.min.css
304 ms
post-910.css
318 ms
frontend.min.css
1276 ms
all.min.css
567 ms
v4-shims.min.css
468 ms
post-68.css
439 ms
post-112.css
534 ms
post-130.css
573 ms
style.css
580 ms
fontawesome.min.css
768 ms
solid.min.css
673 ms
jquery.min.js
883 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
704 ms
bpf_request-data-sheet.js
776 ms
v4-shims.min.js
832 ms
uc.js
18 ms
post-2843.css
744 ms
post-1264.css
827 ms
post-1276.css
810 ms
animations.min.css
854 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
906 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
930 ms
api.js
32 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
935 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
934 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1054 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1017 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1035 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1301 ms
hooks.min.js
1042 ms
i18n.min.js
1134 ms
frontend.min.js
1166 ms
waypoints.min.js
1159 ms
core.min.js
1166 ms
frontend.min.js
1208 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1073 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
1062 ms
Lanis-LanolinVektorlanis-lanolin-cmyk.svg
107 ms
lanolin_bubble.svg
109 ms
PC-Aufmacher-Teaser-Baby-300Px.jpg
155 ms
IU-Trenner-Applications-Schnitt-2-1-1024x331.jpg
250 ms
Lanolin-Website-Chris-6_300x300-p5pglh97drq9rsege0z1dtm5z987e3yeslz6r7v2fk.jpg
242 ms
IO_logo_01.svg
136 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
276 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
202 ms
lanolin.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lanolin.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lanolin.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lanolin.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lanolin.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lanolin.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lanolin. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: