Tools & Wizards About Us
largestoragetank.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

largestoragetank.com

Large Steel Storage Tank Custom Design & Turn-key Project

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

398 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

294 ms

largestoragetank.com screenshot

About Website

Visit largestoragetank.com now to see the best up-to-date Large Storage Tank content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about largestoragetank.com

We are specialized in large steel storage tank design, manufacture, mainly including water, oil, chemical and custom storage tank for sale.

Visit largestoragetank.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Largestoragetank.com page load time and found that the first response time was 398 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

largestoragetank.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.29

41/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.5 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.largestoragetank.com

398 ms

bootstrap.min.css

100 ms

font-awesome.min.css

159 ms

mobilemenu.css

159 ms

jquery.min.js

235 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Largestoragetank.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Sendemailtous.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (486 ms) belongs to the original domain Largestoragetank.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 94.9 kB (4%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Largestoragetank.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 19.3 kB

  • Original 25.3 kB
  • After minification 22.1 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.1 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 65.1 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Large Storage Tank images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 89.8 kB
  • After minification 87.6 kB
  • After compression 82.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 35.5 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 32.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Largestoragetank.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (51%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Large Storage Tank. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.largestoragetank.com

www.largestoragetank.com

398 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

100 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

159 ms

mobilemenu.css

mobilemenu.css

159 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

235 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

162 ms

jquery.rd-navbar.js

jquery.rd-navbar.js

162 ms

wow.js

wow.js

179 ms

tmstickup.js

tmstickup.js

245 ms

style.css

style.css

244 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

244 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

245 ms

mail.js

mail.js

257 ms

jquery.enplaceholder.js

jquery.enplaceholder.js

313 ms

feedback.css

feedback.css

315 ms

gotop.js

gotop.js

315 ms

feedback.js

feedback.js

316 ms

js

js

62 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

29 ms

logo.png

logo.png

100 ms

banner_01.jpg

banner_01.jpg

419 ms

banner_02.jpg

banner_02.jpg

391 ms

banner_03.jpg

banner_03.jpg

486 ms

drinking-water-tank.jpg

drinking-water-tank.jpg

163 ms

large-fuel-storage-tanks.jpg

large-fuel-storage-tanks.jpg

121 ms

chemical-storage-tanks-for-sale.jpg

chemical-storage-tanks-for-sale.jpg

255 ms

custom-storage-tank.jpg

custom-storage-tank.jpg

258 ms

index_21.jpg

index_21.jpg

339 ms

A36-steel-plate.gif

A36-steel-plate.gif

334 ms

tank-project.gif

tank-project.gif

344 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

46 ms

index_03.jpg

index_03.jpg

429 ms

agico.js

agico.js

24 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

396 ms

handle.min.js

handle.min.js

25 ms

feedback.png

feedback.png

356 ms

topbutton.png

topbutton.png

400 ms

input.png

input.png

427 ms

43 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

411 ms

27 ms

Accessibility Review

largestoragetank.com accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

largestoragetank.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

largestoragetank.com SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Largestoragetank.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Largestoragetank.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

largestoragetank.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Large Storage Tank. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: