Tools & Wizards About Us
lasersecurity.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

lasersecurity.org

Laser Security - Providing quality security solutions since 1985

Page Load Speed

849 ms in total

First Response

318 ms

Resources Loaded

320 ms

Page Rendered

211 ms

lasersecurity.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lasersecurity.org homepage info - get ready to check Laser Security best content right away, or after learning these important things about lasersecurity.org

Security Consultants and Engineers specialist installers of Intruder Burglar Alarms, CCTV, Access Control, Automatic Barriers, Gates, and Surveillance Systems

Visit lasersecurity.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Lasersecurity.org page load time and found that the first response time was 318 ms and then it took 531 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lasersecurity.org performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lasersecurity.org

318 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Lasersecurity.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (318 ms) belongs to the original domain Lasersecurity.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 83 B (42%)

Content Size

199 B

After Optimization

116 B

  • HTML

In fact, the total size of Lasersecurity.org main page is 199 B. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 199 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 83 B

  • Original 199 B
  • After minification 131 B
  • After compression 116 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 68 B, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83 B or 42% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Network Requests Diagram

lasersecurity.org

lasersecurity.org

318 ms

Accessibility Review

lasersecurity.org accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

lasersecurity.org best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

lasersecurity.org SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lasersecurity.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lasersecurity.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

lasersecurity.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Laser Security. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: