Tools & Wizards About Us
lasersoft.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

lasersoft.de

Scanner-Software: Weltweit führend – Jetzt gratis testen ✓ SilverFast

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

376 ms

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

705 ms

lasersoft.de screenshot

About Website

Visit lasersoft.de now to see the best up-to-date Lasersoft content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lasersoft.de

Digitalisieren Sie Ihre Fotos, Dias, Negative und Filmstreifen mit SilverFast – Scannen und Bearbeiten wie die Profis, für macOS und Windows.

Visit lasersoft.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Lasersoft.de page load time and found that the first response time was 376 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lasersoft.de performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value530 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lasersoft.de

376 ms

www.silverfast.de

393 ms

702 ms

style.min.css

196 ms

floatbox.css

296 ms

Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lasersoft.de, 96% (110 requests) were made to Silverfast.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Silverfast.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 178.2 kB (5%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lasersoft.de main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 95.0 kB

  • Original 115.8 kB
  • After minification 106.1 kB
  • After compression 20.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 71.3 kB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lasersoft images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 161.3 kB
  • After minification 160.9 kB
  • After compression 158.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 95.3 kB
  • After minification 95.0 kB
  • After compression 86.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lasersoft.de has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (47%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

49

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lasersoft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lasersoft.de

lasersoft.de

376 ms

www.silverfast.de

www.silverfast.de

393 ms

702 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

196 ms

floatbox.css

floatbox.css

296 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

301 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

302 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

303 ms

cms-navigation-base.css

cms-navigation-base.css

303 ms

cms-navigation.css

cms-navigation.css

304 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

398 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

496 ms

animate.compat.css

animate.compat.css

410 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

415 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

414 ms

flickity.min.css

flickity.min.css

416 ms

style.css

style.css

505 ms

before-after-slider.css

before-after-slider.css

499 ms

lsi-section-business.css

lsi-section-business.css

500 ms

timeline.css

timeline.css

499 ms

pricing.css

pricing.css

502 ms

footer.css

footer.css

593 ms

style_mr.css

style_mr.css

593 ms

style.css

style.css

598 ms

language-cookie.js

language-cookie.js

603 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

712 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

604 ms

app.js

app.js

833 ms

js

js

60 ms

floatbox.js

floatbox.js

606 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

712 ms

wpml_language.js

wpml_language.js

611 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

619 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

705 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

816 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

718 ms

flickity.pkgd.min.js

flickity.pkgd.min.js

731 ms

custom.js

custom.js

804 ms

before-after-slider.js

before-after-slider.js

811 ms

StackBlur.js

StackBlur.js

818 ms

app.css

app.css

158 ms

de.png

de.png

111 ms

en.png

en.png

113 ms

fr.png

fr.png

112 ms

es.png

es.png

112 ms

cs.png

cs.png

109 ms

ja.png

ja.png

110 ms

logo-s.png

logo-s.png

201 ms

beach_algarve.jpg

beach_algarve.jpg

403 ms

logo_o.png

logo_o.png

202 ms

scanning_basics_photos.png

scanning_basics_photos.png

498 ms

scanning_basics_slides.png

scanning_basics_slides.png

398 ms

scanning_basics_negatives.png

scanning_basics_negatives.png

301 ms

scanning_basics_kodachromes.png

scanning_basics_kodachromes.png

294 ms

v1-1024x659.png

v1-1024x659.png

686 ms

feature_ExpressScan_top.jpg

feature_ExpressScan_top.jpg

588 ms

banner_e-book_2022_de.png

banner_e-book_2022_de.png

509 ms

boxen1.png

boxen1.png

500 ms

boxen2.png

boxen2.png

502 ms

boxen3.png

boxen3.png

600 ms

products_accessory_250x250.png

products_accessory_250x250.png

603 ms

artemis_old_orange_2.jpg

artemis_old_orange_2.jpg

602 ms

artemis_new_2.jpg

artemis_new_2.jpg

711 ms

banner_2023_09_28.png

banner_2023_09_28.png

687 ms

banner_2023_09_01.png

banner_2023_09_01.png

699 ms

pic_slider_2.png

pic_slider_2.png

1011 ms

IMG_0263-1536x1152.jpg.webp

IMG_0263-1536x1152.jpg.webp

900 ms

Canon-Logo.png

Canon-Logo.png

783 ms

Epson-Logo.png

Epson-Logo.png

783 ms

Microtek-Logo.png

Microtek-Logo.png

799 ms

Minolta-Logo.png

Minolta-Logo.png

811 ms

Nikon-Logo.png

Nikon-Logo.png

881 ms

PIE-Logo.png

PIE-Logo.png

880 ms

Plustek-Logo.png

Plustek-Logo.png

899 ms

Reflecta-Logo.png

Reflecta-Logo.png

927 ms

widget

widget

942 ms

schriftzug_scanner_software_sf9.png

schriftzug_scanner_software_sf9.png

876 ms

button_pdf.png

button_pdf.png

895 ms

schriftzug_imaging_software_sf9.png

schriftzug_imaging_software_sf9.png

896 ms

schriftzug_archiving_software_sf9.png

schriftzug_archiving_software_sf9.png

924 ms

schriftzug_scanner_software_sf8.png

schriftzug_scanner_software_sf8.png

973 ms

schriftzug_imaging_software_sf8.png

schriftzug_imaging_software_sf8.png

1050 ms

SourceSansPro-Regular.ttf

SourceSansPro-Regular.ttf

1171 ms

SourceSansPro-Light.ttf

SourceSansPro-Light.ttf

959 ms

SourceSansPro-ExtraLight.ttf

SourceSansPro-ExtraLight.ttf

1252 ms

SourceSansPro-SemiBold.ttf

SourceSansPro-SemiBold.ttf

1240 ms

SourceSansPro-Black.ttf

SourceSansPro-Black.ttf

1282 ms

SourceSansPro-Bold.ttf

SourceSansPro-Bold.ttf

1106 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

880 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

821 ms

SourceSansPro-Italic.ttf

SourceSansPro-Italic.ttf

835 ms

SourceSansPro-LightItalic.ttf

SourceSansPro-LightItalic.ttf

917 ms

SourceSansPro-ExtraLightItalic.ttf

SourceSansPro-ExtraLightItalic.ttf

924 ms

SourceSansPro-SemiBoldItalic.ttf

SourceSansPro-SemiBoldItalic.ttf

946 ms

SourceSansPro-BoldItalic.ttf

SourceSansPro-BoldItalic.ttf

933 ms

SourceSansPro-BlackItalic.ttf

SourceSansPro-BlackItalic.ttf

948 ms

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

1004 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

951 ms

Classico-URW-T-OT-Medium-Italic_10977.ttf

Classico-URW-T-OT-Medium-Italic_10977.ttf

937 ms

options.js

options.js

934 ms

schriftzug_archiving_software_sf8.png

schriftzug_archiving_software_sf8.png

950 ms

fsg_en.png

fsg_en.png

982 ms

fsg_8_en.png

fsg_8_en.png

920 ms

fsg_hdr_en.png

fsg_hdr_en.png

916 ms

fsg_hdr_8_en.png

fsg_hdr_8_en.png

915 ms

facebook-icon.png

facebook-icon.png

851 ms

twitter-icon.png

twitter-icon.png

857 ms

youtube-icon.png

youtube-icon.png

907 ms

instagram-icon.png

instagram-icon.png

1109 ms

Charity_Heart_org.png

Charity_Heart_org.png

898 ms

Button_Earthrounder_org.png

Button_Earthrounder_org.png

855 ms

js

js

46 ms

core_604.js

core_604.js

182 ms

C.js

C.js

696 ms

Accessibility Review

lasersoft.de accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

lasersoft.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lasersoft.de SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lasersoft.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lasersoft.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lasersoft.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lasersoft. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: