2 sec in total
629 ms
1.1 sec
185 ms
Click here to check amazing Lasikproblem content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lasikproblem.com
Leading Doctors for LASIK Complications | RK Complications | Post LASIK Dry Eye . Office locations around the US AZ, CO, MD, FL, IL, MD, OH, TX, UT, VA, WA
Visit lasikproblem.comWe analyzed Lasikproblem.com page load time and found that the first response time was 629 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
lasikproblem.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
79/100
10%
Value5.1 s
24/100
25%
Value2.3 s
99/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.124
83/100
15%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
629 ms
77 ms
73 ms
19 ms
66 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Lasikproblem.com, 20% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (629 ms) belongs to the original domain Lasikproblem.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (66%)
1.9 MB
642.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Lasikproblem.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 903.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 45.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lasikproblem needs image optimization as it can save up to 45.7 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 397.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 397.6 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 799.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lasikproblem.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 799.7 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (86%)
64
9
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lasikproblem. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lasikproblem.com
629 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
77 ms
layerslider.css
73 ms
css
19 ms
aero-hover-effects.min.css
66 ms
styles.css
79 ms
custom_vc_layout.css
76 ms
style.css
79 ms
map-style.css
101 ms
icons.css
98 ms
reset.css
101 ms
grid.css
105 ms
style.css
131 ms
header.css
109 ms
widgets.css
164 ms
portfolio.css
144 ms
custom.css
159 ms
js_composer.min.css
197 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
154 ms
vc_elements.css
162 ms
css
16 ms
greensock.js
169 ms
jquery.js
256 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
191 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
254 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
195 ms
jwplayer.js
14 ms
t.js
50 ms
adjusted-bounce-rate.min.js
245 ms
css
14 ms
font-awesome.min.css
245 ms
scripts.js
246 ms
jwplayer.js
247 ms
respond.min.js
294 ms
combobox.js
350 ms
checkbox.js
351 ms
jquery.easing.js
351 ms
modernizr.custom.js
350 ms
jquery.dlmenu.js
351 ms
header.js
350 ms
jquery.lazyLoading.js
351 ms
jquery.transform.js
338 ms
effect.min.js
299 ms
effect-drop.min.js
293 ms
jquery.restable.js
293 ms
easyResponsiveTabs.js
291 ms
odometer.js
290 ms
jquery.sticky.js
289 ms
functions.js
269 ms
jquery.mousewheel.pack.js
267 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
268 ms
jquery.fancybox-init.js
263 ms
vc_elements_init.js
262 ms
wp-embed.min.js
264 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
251 ms
analytics.js
72 ms
Precision-LASIK-Complications-Center_Green.png
102 ms
Precision-LASIK-Complications-Center_mini_green.png
102 ms
satellite-image.jpg
116 ms
ga.js
41 ms
pdec-footer-c__1455048780_75.148.26.237.jpg
208 ms
p.js
80 ms
collect
63 ms
uYKcPVoh6c5R0NpdEY5A-Q.woff
28 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
28 ms
d-QWLnp4didxos_6urzFtg.woff
41 ms
MMDEOSa6i6T9gBocjYCJkQ.woff
41 ms
scalia-icons.woff
42 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nDe1_JO-tKU0DX-oOxNOeLI.woff
40 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsO3ikv6SQm_yYbVf3nddkGw.woff
40 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nBKwp2topvuiF0zixBsDXDo.woff
40 ms
__utm.gif
18 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12bxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
10 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
10 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
10 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
10 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8xsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
10 ms
IczWvq5y_Cwwv_rBjOtT0w.woff
10 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
11 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-kxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
11 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
10 ms
precision_mobile_homepage-modified.jpg
35 ms
lasikproblem.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
lasikproblem.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lasikproblem.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lasikproblem.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lasikproblem.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lasikproblem.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lasikproblem. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: