7.6 sec in total
625 ms
6.6 sec
349 ms
Visit laskin.in now to see the best up-to-date L A Skin content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about laskin.in
LA Skin and Aesthetic Clinic is delhi's Best non-surgical skin clinic, dermatologist in delhi, laser hair removal in delhi, acne scar treatment in delhi, Skin Care
Visit laskin.inWe analyzed Laskin.in page load time and found that the first response time was 625 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
laskin.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value18.4 s
0/100
25%
Value11.2 s
5/100
10%
Value4,240 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.552
13/100
15%
Value17.0 s
4/100
10%
625 ms
208 ms
557 ms
158 ms
214 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Laskin.in, 15% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 2% (2 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Laskin.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (76%)
1.9 MB
453.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Laskin.in main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, L A Skin needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 86% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 6.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 195 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Laskin.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (66%)
79
27
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of L A Skin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.laskin.in
625 ms
css
208 ms
style.css
557 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
158 ms
jquery-latest.js
214 ms
style.css
971 ms
smoothscroller.js
675 ms
styles.css
675 ms
main.min.css
722 ms
font-awesome.min.css
733 ms
modules.min.css
1102 ms
plugins.css
1155 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1196 ms
www.laskin.in
1569 ms
lightbox.min.css
1281 ms
jquery.js
977 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
990 ms
plugins.js
997 ms
main.min.js
1014 ms
home.js
1652 ms
home.js
1674 ms
js
222 ms
widget.js
1788 ms
widget.css
1904 ms
font-awesome.min.css
196 ms
email-decode.min.js
1287 ms
jquery.js
258 ms
skdslider.min.js
1303 ms
skdslider.css
1973 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1640 ms
scripts.js
1640 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1641 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
1687 ms
scroll-back-to-top.js
1675 ms
jquery.touchwipe.min.js
1676 ms
jquery.lightbox.min.js
1675 ms
fbevents.js
232 ms
finallogo.jpg
702 ms
01.png
1131 ms
02.png
1307 ms
03.png
1338 ms
04.png
1422 ms
4.jpg
1039 ms
5.jpg
1102 ms
medical-dermatology.jpg
1597 ms
aesthtic.jpg
1644 ms
laser.jpg
1657 ms
dermatological.jpg
1846 ms
skincare.jpg
1864 ms
go.jpg
1959 ms
facebook.png
2156 ms
youtube.png
2187 ms
pintrest.png
2214 ms
twitter.png
2403 ms
instagram.png
2436 ms
linkedin.png
2500 ms
logo-icon.png
2431 ms
default
376 ms
analytics.js
269 ms
gtm.js
146 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff
184 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff
186 ms
footer-map-icon.png
2519 ms
116390148762315
165 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
95 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2703 ms
collect
259 ms
collect
288 ms
slide-bg-active.png
2006 ms
slide-bg.png
2031 ms
left.png
2046 ms
right.png
2096 ms
ga-audiences
43 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
59 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
28 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
69 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
87 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
73 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
85 ms
twk-main.js
36 ms
twk-vendor.js
61 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
98 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
75 ms
twk-runtime.js
122 ms
twk-app.js
86 ms
laskin.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
laskin.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
laskin.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Laskin.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Laskin.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
laskin.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of L A Skin. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: