Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

lastinput.com

** LASTINPUT.COM **

Page Load Speed

671 ms in total

First Response

163 ms

Resources Loaded

418 ms

Page Rendered

90 ms

lastinput.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lastinput.com now to see the best up-to-date LASTINPUT content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lastinput.com

Visit lastinput.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lastinput.com page load time and found that the first response time was 163 ms and then it took 508 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lastinput.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lastinput.com

163 ms

experience-abundance-in-your-life.php

106 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

4 ms

standard.js

20 ms

google_caf.js

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lastinput.com, 33% (4 requests) were made to Bethechangeteam.com and 17% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (163 ms) belongs to the original domain Lastinput.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 303 B (0%)

Content Size

70.0 kB

After Optimization

69.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Lastinput.com main page is 70.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 69.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 146 B

  • Original 390 B
  • After minification 343 B
  • After compression 244 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 47 B, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 146 B or 37% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 157 B

  • Original 69.6 kB
  • After minification 69.6 kB
  • After compression 69.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (36%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LASTINPUT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lastinput.com accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

lastinput.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lastinput.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lastinput.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Lastinput.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LASTINPUT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: