5.5 sec in total
1.8 sec
3.3 sec
405 ms
Visit latentimage.us now to see the best up-to-date Latentimage content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about latentimage.us
Latent Image is curated by Max Marshall. One post per day, since June 5th, 2010.
Visit latentimage.usWe analyzed Latentimage.us page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
latentimage.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value3.7 s
58/100
25%
Value3.4 s
89/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.099
90/100
15%
Value4.1 s
86/100
10%
1812 ms
77 ms
156 ms
154 ms
144 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Latentimage.us, 12% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Latentimage.us.
Page size can be reduced by 975.3 kB (20%)
4.9 MB
3.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Latentimage.us main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 655.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Latentimage needs image optimization as it can save up to 655.4 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 253.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 253.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 46.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Latentimage.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (53%)
47
22
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Latentimage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
latentimage.us
1812 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
77 ms
styles.css
156 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
154 ms
twitter-feed.css
144 ms
style.css
139 ms
font-awesome.min.css
141 ms
jquery.js
284 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
221 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.js
218 ms
front.js
229 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
238 ms
theme.js
235 ms
zkj1cye.js
201 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
288 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
289 ms
jquery.lockfixed.min.js
297 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
303 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
305 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
349 ms
jquery.mobile-events.min.js
356 ms
jquery.form.min.js
369 ms
scripts.js
366 ms
comment-reply.min.js
383 ms
wp-embed.min.js
392 ms
master.css
302 ms
latentimage.us
199 ms
logo.png
118 ms
t-search.png
115 ms
t-lights.png
117 ms
thelatentimage-crick-01.png
567 ms
thelatentimage-crick-03.png
503 ms
thelatentimage-crick-02.png
506 ms
thelatentimage-crick-05.png
573 ms
thelatentimage-crick-04.png
637 ms
nav-next.png
160 ms
thelatentimage-feature-a-new-nothing-12.png
754 ms
thelatentimage-feature-a-new-nothing-10.png
745 ms
thelatentimage-feature-a-new-nothing-08.png
797 ms
thelatentimage-feature-a-new-nothing-06.png
801 ms
s-rss.png
646 ms
s-facebook.png
723 ms
s-twitter.png
724 ms
pattern.png
795 ms
analytics.js
91 ms
21a9.png
135 ms
OmaIed-3hka-3DR-Mg_REgpsXUQw0neILzMQAWv-1LSff5WcggMmeMJ6Mk6f5Mb.woff
55 ms
Pm-ClRfDbN43f_uMFwhduNdpSDJqX2e3KNqEIELYRIMffJrgggMmeMJ6Mk6f5M9.woff
112 ms
XAvffsOIO_BRPkCW8PIUbcmQ_b8cOS3Vj2RbVt-HzQbff4AgggMmeMJ6Mk6f5Mt.woff
139 ms
YtOOJdvg7ITjSk3GI-pzmUpchygjWDJoI_bqshyFXNJff4fgggMmeMJ6Mk6f5Mv.woff
143 ms
collect
31 ms
p.gif
123 ms
latentimage.us accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
latentimage.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
latentimage.us SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Latentimage.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Latentimage.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
latentimage.us
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Latentimage. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: