Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

latticelighting.com

China street light manufacturer - CECEP outdoor lighting manufacturer

Page Load Speed

8.7 sec in total

First Response

262 ms

Resources Loaded

6.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

latticelighting.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to latticelighting.com homepage info - get ready to check Lattice Lighting best content right away, or after learning these important things about latticelighting.com

CECEP is professional China street light manufacturer.The main products incloude solar LED street light, LED tunnel light, back roads LED lights, etc.

Visit latticelighting.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Latticelighting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 262 ms and then it took 8.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

latticelighting.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,200 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.119

85/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.latticelighting.com

262 ms

public.css

204 ms

style.css

66 ms

button.css

117 ms

style.css

229 ms

Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Latticelighting.com, 63% (64 requests) were made to Inrorwxhikoolp5p-static.micyjz.com and 14% (14 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) relates to the external source Inrorwxhikoolp5p-static.micyjz.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 381.4 kB (4%)

Content Size

8.8 MB

After Optimization

8.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Latticelighting.com main page is 8.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 244.8 kB

  • Original 294.3 kB
  • After minification 294.3 kB
  • After compression 49.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 244.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 112.2 kB

  • Original 8.3 MB
  • After minification 8.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lattice Lighting images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 24.3 kB

  • Original 196.5 kB
  • After minification 196.5 kB
  • After compression 172.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.3 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (22%)

Requests Now

98

After Optimization

76

The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lattice Lighting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

latticelighting.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

latticelighting.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

latticelighting.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Latticelighting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Latticelighting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lattice Lighting. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: