Tools & Wizards About Us
latticetopfence.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 55

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

latticetopfence.com

Lattice Top Fence | Contact Us | Auburn Enumclaw WA

Page Load Speed

625 ms in total

First Response

48 ms

Resources Loaded

408 ms

Page Rendered

169 ms

latticetopfence.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lattice Top Fence content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about latticetopfence.com

Residential wood fence, deck, trellises and more by family-owned Lattice Top Fence Company. Call today to get your free estimate!

Visit latticetopfence.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Latticetopfence.com page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 577 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

latticetopfence.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.467

19/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.0 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.latticetopfence.com

48 ms

site.css

18 ms

duel.js

26 ms

jq.js

80 ms

subNavigation.js

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Latticetopfence.com, 53% (25 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com and 23% (11 requests) were made to Nebula.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (144 ms) relates to the external source Nebula.wsimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 321.1 kB (8%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Latticetopfence.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 38.7 kB

  • Original 48.5 kB
  • After minification 48.5 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 870 B

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lattice Top Fence images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 187.9 kB

  • Original 329.2 kB
  • After minification 328.9 kB
  • After compression 141.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 187.9 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 93.6 kB

  • Original 114.5 kB
  • After minification 114.4 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Latticetopfence.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 93.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (60%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lattice Top Fence. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.latticetopfence.com

www.latticetopfence.com

48 ms

site.css

site.css

18 ms

duel.js

duel.js

26 ms

jq.js

jq.js

80 ms

subNavigation.js

subNavigation.js

76 ms

facebookSDKHelper.js

facebookSDKHelper.js

69 ms

f5c9dc8922a25e2c847ac1f5996255f3

f5c9dc8922a25e2c847ac1f5996255f3

128 ms

customForm.published.js

customForm.published.js

60 ms

blue-seal-250-52-bbb-7044115.png

blue-seal-250-52-bbb-7044115.png

76 ms

media.gallery.js

media.gallery.js

108 ms

cookiemanager.js

cookiemanager.js

84 ms

iebackground.js

iebackground.js

107 ms

ga.js

ga.js

114 ms

2a2cd3d97eaa030df2dd0e00082b4431

2a2cd3d97eaa030df2dd0e00082b4431

113 ms

6d00387715810c7ce69369bd8bd0170e

6d00387715810c7ce69369bd8bd0170e

144 ms

7fbdb10c92e65255936119cc4331c079

7fbdb10c92e65255936119cc4331c079

138 ms

f282bf6dec121d034ef51802b3cdb35e

f282bf6dec121d034ef51802b3cdb35e

144 ms

c25fed21389bd370e8c5cc96b5eb0fe3

c25fed21389bd370e8c5cc96b5eb0fe3

142 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

80 ms

util.fbSDKLoader.js

util.fbSDKLoader.js

31 ms

util.window.js

util.window.js

53 ms

regexhelper.js

regexhelper.js

43 ms

api.guid.js

api.guid.js

66 ms

jquery.xDomainRequest.js

jquery.xDomainRequest.js

93 ms

tipper.js

tipper.js

91 ms

datepicker.js

datepicker.js

66 ms

jquery.watermark.js

jquery.watermark.js

65 ms

helper.js

helper.js

57 ms

growl.js

growl.js

55 ms

8vIU7ww63mVu7gtR-kwKxNvkNOjw-tbnfY3lCw.woff

8vIU7ww63mVu7gtR-kwKxNvkNOjw-tbnfY3lCw.woff

34 ms

util.instances.js

util.instances.js

33 ms

util.model.js

util.model.js

34 ms

documentHelper.js

documentHelper.js

34 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

29 ms

sf.datepicker.js

sf.datepicker.js

32 ms

sf.core.pkg.js

sf.core.pkg.js

31 ms

browser.js

browser.js

14 ms

6154560d1f04eefde59cb33b62380971

6154560d1f04eefde59cb33b62380971

10 ms

wsb-slideshow-arrows.png

wsb-slideshow-arrows.png

19 ms

sf.tipper.js

sf.tipper.js

26 ms

9fb79290fb8e7beb8e400577059abadd

9fb79290fb8e7beb8e400577059abadd

84 ms

b06c3661c562d3334b0198beee66dbe6

b06c3661c562d3334b0198beee66dbe6

23 ms

88be87527a1ba37f8ef3c26fd633ae71

88be87527a1ba37f8ef3c26fd633ae71

41 ms

57418f110e2c7ed4424f0b16930af389

57418f110e2c7ed4424f0b16930af389

10 ms

app.css

app.css

25 ms

app.css

app.css

42 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

41 ms

Accessibility Review

latticetopfence.com accessibility score

55

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

latticetopfence.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

latticetopfence.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Latticetopfence.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Latticetopfence.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

latticetopfence.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lattice Top Fence. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: