3.1 sec in total
206 ms
2.5 sec
336 ms
Visit laughingbird.com now to see the best up-to-date Laughingbird content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about laughingbird.com
Whether you need a character mascot, Facebook image, or a custom logo design – The Graphics Creator has easy tools that make designing images for your small business, your blogs, and your social media...
Visit laughingbird.comWe analyzed Laughingbird.com page load time and found that the first response time was 206 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
laughingbird.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value16.2 s
0/100
25%
Value6.4 s
41/100
10%
Value2,930 ms
3/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value17.8 s
4/100
10%
206 ms
357 ms
1258 ms
32 ms
68 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Laughingbird.com, 68% (36 requests) were made to Laughingbirdsoftware.com and 17% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Laughingbirdsoftware.com.
Page size can be reduced by 694.0 kB (54%)
1.3 MB
596.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Laughingbird.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 453.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Laughingbird images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 288.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 288.2 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 354.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Laughingbird.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 354.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (63%)
41
15
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Laughingbird. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
laughingbird.com
206 ms
www.laughingbirdsoftware.com
357 ms
www.laughingbirdsoftware.com
1258 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
68 ms
video-js.css
75 ms
customuserfacing.css
241 ms
style.min.css
256 ms
default.min.css
324 ms
jquery.js
221 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
121 ms
video.js
77 ms
op-jquery-base-all.min.js
153 ms
common.js
296 ms
UserProfileShortcode.js
371 ms
paymentvalidation.js
397 ms
jquery.validationEngine.js
456 ms
jquery.validationEngine-en.js
429 ms
utils.min.js
371 ms
countries.js
531 ms
country-state.js
499 ms
xbrander_style.css
371 ms
xbrander_public.js
401 ms
css
78 ms
css
92 ms
comment-reply.min.js
430 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
434 ms
common.min.js
461 ms
wp-embed.min.js
465 ms
op-front-all.min.js
578 ms
menus.min.js
490 ms
collect
33 ms
__utm.gif
6 ms
graphics-software-1024x216.jpg
116 ms
blank.png
114 ms
graphics-software.jpg
116 ms
graphics-and-marketing-header.png
117 ms
laughingbird_GetStarted1.png
121 ms
MacWin.jpg
115 ms
The-Logo-Creator-version-7-1.jpg
121 ms
button-style-2-silver.png
120 ms
take-a-tour.png
120 ms
Laughingbirds_Add-to-cart_button-300x82.png
119 ms
Laughingbird.png
121 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
83 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
95 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
118 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
119 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
119 ms
gQ0PT3rPU_Et2ExNz-ahmqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
118 ms
We_iSDqttE3etzfdfhuPRUgbSk09ekaEjkXjfj0Ujx8.ttf
117 ms
YDAoLskQQ5MOAgvHUQCcLbvy90DtE_Pg_qiF9bHvTzw.ttf
109 ms
We_iSDqttE3etzfdfhuPRX4NhRhUVU1NOvrEWRXSCoI.ttf
120 ms
laughingbird.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
laughingbird.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
laughingbird.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Laughingbird.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Laughingbird.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
laughingbird.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Laughingbird. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: