Tools & Wizards About Us
laundrybreak.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

laundrybreak.com

Laundrybreak | Laundry & Dry-Cleaning Delivery in Yonkers

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

48 ms

Resources Loaded

914 ms

Page Rendered

80 ms

laundrybreak.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Laundrybreak content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about laundrybreak.com

Searching for a Laundry & Dry-Cleaning Delivery in Yonkers? Pay a visit to LaundryBreak. We provide a selection of Wash, dry & fold service and more.

Visit laundrybreak.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Laundrybreak.com page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 994 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

laundrybreak.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,190 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.0 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

laundrybreak.com

48 ms

laundrybreak.com

157 ms

gtm.js

116 ms

platform.js

71 ms

8785fb246a1340259d4789ea9c02090f.png

756 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Laundrybreak.com, 11% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 11% (1 request) were made to Apps.elfsight.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (756 ms) relates to the external source Img77.uenicdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 604.0 kB (30%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Laundrybreak.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 603.8 kB

  • Original 743.2 kB
  • After minification 743.0 kB
  • After compression 139.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 603.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 143.6 kB
  • After minification 143.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Laundrybreak images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 194 B

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 1.1 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (50%)

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Laundrybreak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

laundrybreak.com

laundrybreak.com

48 ms

laundrybreak.com

laundrybreak.com

157 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

116 ms

platform.js

platform.js

71 ms

8785fb246a1340259d4789ea9c02090f.png

8785fb246a1340259d4789ea9c02090f.png

756 ms

shutterstock_785264662.jpg

shutterstock_785264662.jpg

620 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

16 ms

organic.bc2baae49310f27c248130ae0a6cdf6bbfd9dd7a.js

organic.bc2baae49310f27c248130ae0a6cdf6bbfd9dd7a.js

191 ms

platform.js

platform.js

56 ms

Accessibility Review

laundrybreak.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

laundrybreak.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

laundrybreak.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Laundrybreak.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Laundrybreak.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

laundrybreak.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Laundrybreak. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: