Tools & Wizards About Us
laundrylicious.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

laundrylicious.com

Laundry Service & Dry Cleaning Valet in Orange County - Laundrylicious Laundry Valet & Dry Cleaning in Orange County and LA County

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

222 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

514 ms

laundrylicious.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Laundrylicious content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about laundrylicious.com

Laundrylicious Laundry Valet & Dry Cleaning in Orange County and LA County laundry and dry cleaning pick up & delivery service in Southern California

Visit laundrylicious.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Laundrylicious.com page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

laundrylicious.com performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value27.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,010 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.489

17/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

laundrylicious.com

222 ms

laundrylicious.com

92 ms

style.min.css

30 ms

522d49bc8c0414554fbfd7f5b9e4af98.css

91 ms

65d28b4b5361d688b50f89f58bfe1fd2.js

84 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Laundrylicious.com, 23% (14 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Laundrylicious.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 407.8 kB (11%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Laundrylicious.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 115.3 kB

  • Original 139.5 kB
  • After minification 139.3 kB
  • After compression 24.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 35.0 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Laundrylicious images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 55.9 kB

  • Original 715.0 kB
  • After minification 715.0 kB
  • After compression 659.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 201.6 kB

  • Original 233.1 kB
  • After minification 31.5 kB
  • After compression 31.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Laundrylicious.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 201.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (67%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Laundrylicious. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

laundrylicious.com

laundrylicious.com

222 ms

laundrylicious.com

laundrylicious.com

92 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

30 ms

522d49bc8c0414554fbfd7f5b9e4af98.css

522d49bc8c0414554fbfd7f5b9e4af98.css

91 ms

65d28b4b5361d688b50f89f58bfe1fd2.js

65d28b4b5361d688b50f89f58bfe1fd2.js

84 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

486 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

55 ms

api.js

api.js

80 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

45 ms

css

css

42 ms

fbe62d6f63ad08c5122f3b0028239dca.css

fbe62d6f63ad08c5122f3b0028239dca.css

184 ms

714b5c1efd74b3a0a8eca382a387214b.js

714b5c1efd74b3a0a8eca382a387214b.js

173 ms

14cb159ba3f4ac8fe508b9c6f8534a32.js

14cb159ba3f4ac8fe508b9c6f8534a32.js

70 ms

css

css

24 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

172 ms

default

default

303 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

216 ms

bat.js

bat.js

215 ms

5d48d17a-18d8-480d-a0d6-ef2a9f7ec8c3.js

5d48d17a-18d8-480d-a0d6-ef2a9f7ec8c3.js

272 ms

IMG_2219-2048x1908.jpg

IMG_2219-2048x1908.jpg

201 ms

IMG_2845-1536x1152.jpg

IMG_2845-1536x1152.jpg

200 ms

IMG_2881-1536x1265.jpg

IMG_2881-1536x1265.jpg

197 ms

daniel-roth-QHTch5kP2qY-unsplash-scaled.jpg

daniel-roth-QHTch5kP2qY-unsplash-scaled.jpg

197 ms

IMG_7908-scaled.jpg

IMG_7908-scaled.jpg

200 ms

washingmachines-e1468447052240.jpg

washingmachines-e1468447052240.jpg

109 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyDPA-9a6VQ.woff

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyDPA-9a6VQ.woff

222 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

195 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

232 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

287 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

146 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff

147 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff

147 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

175 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

194 ms

api.min.js

api.min.js

149 ms

5437896.js

5437896.js

87 ms

collect

collect

66 ms

logo-Ai-2-copy.png

logo-Ai-2-copy.png

84 ms

instagram-logo-e1493452195911-160x40.png

instagram-logo-e1493452195911-160x40.png

65 ms

twitterlogo-e1493452051454-160x30.png

twitterlogo-e1493452051454-160x30.png

64 ms

yelp-bw-e1493452090272-160x90.png

yelp-bw-e1493452090272-160x90.png

64 ms

logo_facebook-sm-160x68.png

logo_facebook-sm-160x68.png

83 ms

google-logo-flat-black-sm-160x53.png

google-logo-flat-black-sm-160x53.png

65 ms

gj.css

gj.css

74 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

569 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

417 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

366 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

518 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1646 ms

default

default

161 ms

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

55 ms

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

82 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

109 ms

twk-entries-polyfill.js

twk-entries-polyfill.js

100 ms

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

123 ms

twk-promise-polyfill.js

twk-promise-polyfill.js

122 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

78 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

93 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

122 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

109 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

120 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

182 ms

Accessibility Review

laundrylicious.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

laundrylicious.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

laundrylicious.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Laundrylicious.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Laundrylicious.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

laundrylicious.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Laundrylicious. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: